Answer:
b. The production decisions of a pharmaceutical firm
Explanation:
The production decisions of a pharmaceutical firm is an aspect of microeconomics.
Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that studies the economy
Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies individuals, firms and households.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Naked Title
Explanation:
The naked title entitles in the title holder to enforce trust to comply with the clauses of the agreement because this right is given to the trustee. Such titles does not possesses any sort of rights of the ownership of asset and its use. So the only purpose includes the tax benefits and the enforcement of the compliance with the clauses of agreements.
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
Answer:
The answer is "Operating expense of $800,000 and liability of $800,000".
Explanation:
It's obvious from its government that the company must recall any paint cans which have proved health hazardous. Its organization must remember its $800,000 in canned cans. The cost of recall would also be referred to as administration fees since these costs aren't linked to its production of the paints. All operations of the company were performed. It must be held responsible for the calculation of the recalling costs.
Answer:
- 0.80
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand describes the extent to which the quantity demanded of good X changes as result of a change in its own price.
The midpoint formula for price elasticity of demand is presented and used as follows:
Percentage change in quantity = %ΔQ = [Q2 - Q1] / [(Q2 + Q1) ÷ 2] × 100
Percentage change in quantity = %ΔP = [P2 - P1] / [(P2 + P1) ÷ 2] × 100
Midpoint price elasticity of demand = %ΔQ / %ΔP
Where:
Q2 = New quantity of good X = 150
Q1 = Initial quantity of good X = 100
P2 = New price of good X = $6
P1 = Initial price of good X = $10
Therefore,
Percentage change in quantity = %ΔQ = [150 - 100] / [(150 + 100) ÷ 2] × 100
= [50/(250 ÷ 2)] × 100
= (50/125) × 100
= 40.00%
Percentage change in quantity = %ΔP = [$6 - $10] / [($6 + $10) ÷ 2] × 100
= [-$4/($16 ÷ $2)] × 100
= (-$4/$8) × 100
= - 50.00%
Price elasticity of demand = 40% / 50% = - 0.80
The elasticity of demand of -0.80 less than 1. That indicate that the quantity demand is inelastic. That is the change in the degree of change in the quantity demanded of good X is lower than the degree of change in its price.
