All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is NOT true regarding locationâ decisions?

Business

1 answer:

Lilit [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: The correct answer is choice b.

Explanation: Location is very important for businesses. Of the options presented, the only one that is incorrect is choice b - Once management is committed to a specific location, many costs become easy to reduce. This choice is incorrect. Even though management is committed to a location, it does not mean that it is easy to reduce costs. Even though they are committed to a location, it may be impossible to reduce costs.

You might be interested in

You are given the following information about a portfolio you are to manage. For the long term, you are bullish, but you think t

Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

sell 1.714

Explanation:

The computation of the number of contract buy or sold to hedge the position is shown below:

As we know that

Number of contracts = Hedge Ratio

Hedge Ratio = Change in Portfolio Value ÷ Profit on one future contract

where,

Change in the value of the portfolio is

For that we need to do following calculations

Expected Drop in Index is

= (1200 - 1400) ÷ 1400

= -14.29%

And, Expected Loss on the portfolio is

= Beta × Expected index drop

= 0.60 × (-14.29%)

= -8.57%

So, the change is

= 1000000 × (-8.57%)

= -$85,700

And, the profit is

= 200 × 250 multiplier

= 50,000

So, the hedging position is

= -$85,700 ÷ 50,000

= -1.714

This reflects the selling position

3 0

3 years ago

(bank deregulation some economists argue that deregulating the interest rates that could be paid on deposits combined with depos

muminat

Base on my research this type of argument is baseless but it depends on the 100% free enterprise market system. With this system, the government doesn't have regulatory powers to protect the interest of the consumers from the financial institutions. In a situation that without the interest rate modulation, the rate charged on loans could be 40% while the rate paid on savings could be 1%. If this happens the financial institutions will not have to pay FDIC insurance to ensure the solvency of the overall system.

3 0

3 years ago

A decrease in energy prices will: decrease short-run aggregate supply. increase short-run aggregate supply. decrease aggregate d

Alex73 [517]

Answer:

increase short-run aggregate supply.

Explanation:

Given that energy is an important part of the production process. It is often considered to be the next in line after labor, thereby having a significant effect on the economy's aggregate supply of real production.

Hence, a decrease in energy prices will decrease the production cost and in turn lead to an increase in short-run aggregate supply, thereby making the SRAS curve shift rightward.

This is because a decrease in energy prices will make it possible for companies to increase their supply of real production at a cheaper cost

7 0

3 years ago

How can business help in solving social problem

Katen [24]

Business generates those resources when it makes a profit. And those resources can help to solve social and environmental problems, they only have to reallocate these profits to social problems. Many companies don't still know but, when they really make profit is when they solve social problems.

3 0

3 years ago

WinterDreams operates a Rocky Mountain ski resort. The company is planning its lift ticket pricing for the coming ski season. In

Kitty [74]

Answer:

a. Would Mountain Point emphasize target pricing or cost-plus pricing? Why?

They emphasize cost plus pricing because the investors are seeking a desired rate of return on their investment and they do it by adding the desired profit margin to their costs.

b. If other resorts in the area charge $66 per day, what price should Mount Snow charge?

$75.50 in order for them to generate the required ROI. Since the resort has a very good reputation, it can charge a higher price than its competitors.

Explanation:

company's assets = $115,000,000

expected return on investment = 16%

fixed costs = $35,600,000

number of customers = 800,000

variable costs = $8 per customer x 800,000 = $6,400,000

total costs = $42,000,000

total cost per client = $42,000,000 / 800,000 = $52.50

desired profit = $115,000,000 x 16% = $18,400,000

desired profit per client = $18,400,000 / 800,000 = $23

price per ticket = $75.50

8 0

3 years ago