(b) Statue of frauds
<span>Statue of frauds is generally the requirement of particular
contracts to be in writing and signed by all parties involved in an agreement.
In the context of real estate, the statue of frauds protects tenants from
unfair eviction or tenancy termination. Similarly, it protects property buyers from
sellers’ “change of mind” or refusal to sell the property on the grounds that
the seller obtained a higher offer price from another interested buyer. However,
there are exemptions to the statue of frauds which vary from state to state. </span>
Answer: correct evaluation and medium of exchange etc.
Explanation: The main problem with the barter system is that it would be hard to value the goods or services that the parties are exchanging. In the given case, it would be hard to value how many car washes would be equal to a paint of house.
Also finding someone who is willing to paint house in exchange of car washes is another difficult task.
In the given situation, Amelia is wrong. Anyone who is fully aware and supported any criminal acts is considered a violator of the law. All people who participated in a criminal act is guilty of the crime.
However, it will only be punishable if there are witnesses and evidence.
Answer:
The amount of dividend received by common stockholders in 2017 = $7500
Explanation:
The preference shares are cumulative which means the 2015 dividend on cumulative preference shares will be paid in the next year when dividend is declatred.
The total dividend on preference shjares is = 2500 * 100 * 0.05 = $12500
In 2016 dividend of 22500 is declared and paid.
Out of this 22500, 12500 relates to prefernece dividend for 2015.
The remaining 10000 relates to 2016 preference dividend. Thus, 2500 of 2016 preference dividned is outstanding and will be paid in 2017.
In 2017 out of 22500, 15000 (12500 + 2500) dividendd is paid to preference share holders.
The amount of dividend received by common stockholders in 2017 = 22500 - 15000 = $7500
Answer:
The correct answer is A. increase tax rates and/or reduce government spending.
Explanation:
Increasing the tax burden is an easy way for the state to increase its income temporarily and subject matter, but it turns out that increasing the tax burden affects productivity and consumption, so in the end the income of the productive sector is diminished, and more taxes on a lower taxable base does not imply increasing revenues.
When a government decides to reduce public spending for a fiscal balance, it is limited to reducing the social assistance and social security, but not to reduce the bureaucratic apparatus that curiously is usually high in countries with economic crisis, and also Be a source of corruption corruption.
