Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
Honestly there really isn't a answer to this
Answer:
Traci is using the conflict resolution technique of <u><em>Withdrawing / Avoiding</em></u>.
Explanation:
In conflict resolutions among two parties in an organization, there are various techniwues that could be adopted which would determine the results that would be achieved.
<em>The one adopted by Traci is called withdrawing? Avoiding technique as a result of his absolute silence in the bickering situation.</em>
A government with a king or queen ruling over the area, and making most of the economic decisions along with members of the royal court, is known as a Monarchy.
You have to be at least 16
