The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
Answer:
taxes
Explanation:
there is federal, state, and government taxes included in your gas price
hope this helps :)
Answer:
It will be difficult for Mary to compare the crime rates in a U.S. city with her hometown of London, England:
b. There are differences in the way crime is measured.
Explanation:
- The option a is not correct as it is not true that England doesn't have any crime statistics that are available to civilians.
- The option b is correct as the ways of measuring crimes are different for different regions or places.
- The option c is not correct as there is no dictatorship in England.
- The option d is not correct as it is not true that only solved cases are included in England's crime rates.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
because if you raise it high enough you can get less people to buy seen it in a lot of places
Answer: The correct answer is " a. $92,000.".
Explanation: The explicit costs are observable, that is, those that we can easily take into account and decrease our operating result (salaries paid to employees, material costs, taxes, etc.)
So her total explicit cost were: $12 000 + $65 000 + $15 000 = $92 000.
