Consecutive numbers would be like 2 and 3, or 7 and 8.
All we need to do is keep multiplying pairs of consecutive numbers until we get above 50.
1 × 2 = 2 (that's one.)
2 × 3 = 6 (two)
3 × 4 = 12 (three)
4 × 5 = 20 (four)
5 × 6 = 30 (five)
6 × 7 = 42 (six...)
<em>7 × 8 = 56 > 50</em>
We have a total of 6 numbers that equal the product of 2 consecutive intergers<em>
</em>
Answer:
you did it wrong you have to subtract X from 8900.
First you want to subtract 390 from 8900 and that equals
<h2>8510</h2>
Answer:
no thanks for your number
Step-by-step explanation:
Have a great day
Answer:
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC and given a chart with which Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate"
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
p + n + d + q = 25
Put everything into quarters.
p and q are equally likely to be drawn
q + n + d + q = 25
There are 3 times as many nickels as quarters
n = 3q
q + 3q + d + q = 25
There is 25% more dimes than quarters.
d = 1.25 q
q + 3q + 1.25q + q = 25
6.25 q = 25
q = 25/6,25
=====================
q = 4
p = 4
d = 1.25 * 4 = 5
n = 12
