1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Umnica [9.8K]
3 years ago
11

Compare marriage of an Athenian and Spartan girl.

History
2 answers:
sergeinik [125]3 years ago
6 0
Spartan women were married at the age of 18 and were never married to strangers. They always knew the bachelors by name. They always had the right to discuss the marriage with their fathers before the marriage. To put it in simple terms, Spartan women had freedom of whom they wanted to marry. Athenian women had less freedom in their marriage choices. They could not meet their grooms before getting married. They only first saw their grooms when they were about to get married.

I hope this helped! If I need more detail, please reply. If not, please mark this the brainliest (if you believe it is, of course)!
Step2247 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Spartan women contracted marriage relatively later than their contemporaries from other regions of ancient Greece. While Athenian girls used to get married for the first time at around fourteen, the Spartans married around 18 with men of about the same age. From the age of seven, children had to leave for military camps with the purpose of becoming a Spartan, so that until around the age of 30, they are forced to sneak out of the camps to find and see their wives. The absence of men in the family nucleus gave the married woman greater freedom and more responsibilities. They became owners of the house and were in charge of family belongings while their husbands were away; unlike in other states of the time, the Spartan woman could travel outside the home without restriction.

In Athens, when a father died without leaving a will and without male children, his widow had no choice but marriage. The law forced her to marry one of the relatives, but not in the ascending line. If the heiress was poor (thessa), she married a single close relative or someone suitable for her rank. When there were several heirs, the closest one had priority (see epilogue). In fact, the heiress, along with her inheritance, belonged to the relatives of the family, so much so that in ancient times a father could not give his daughter (if she was an heiress) in marriage without the consent of the other members of the family. family.18 This was not the case, however, of later Athenian laws, which allowed a father to dispose of his daughter, according to his own will; as were the widows who were given in marriage according to her husband's testamentary wishes, since these were considered their legitimate representatives (kyrioi).

The same custom of marrying in the family (oikos), especially in the case of the heiresses, was also in force in Sparta. Leonidas I married the heiress of Cleomenes I, as his anchisteia, or closest relative, and Anaxándridas II, with his sister's daughter. In addition, if a father had not established anything regarding the daughter, it was the courts that decided who should be the privileged, among the members of the same family, to marry the heiress, similar to the Athens law concerning the heiresses are also found in the Jewish code, as detailed in the Numbers (c. XXVII, 1-11), and exemplified in Ruth (chap. IV).

You might be interested in
What did James Madison expect the Constitutional Convention to do? A. solve the problems of the Articles of Confederation
scZoUnD [109]
The one that James Madison expected the constitutional convention do is : C. Replace the articles of Confederation
According to madison, the articles was way to weak and it needed to be replaced by the new one

hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Which was a consequence of the Protestant Reformation?
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

<h3>The literature on the consequences of the Reformation shows a variety of short- and long-run effects, including Protestant-Catholic differences in human capital, economic development, competition in media markets, political economy, and anti-Semitism, among others.</h3>
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Spanish want to colonize the Americans
lord [1]

Answer:

-gold/ riches

-spread of Catholic faith

-credit for discovering shortcut to Asia

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
In the short form ballot some negative consequences may be?
marysya [2.9K]
 I think this is the right answer. In the short form ballot, some negative consequences may be that it would curtail our right to select the candidate of our choice. Please let me know if it is wrong.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The short-lived state of franklin was located in which present-day state?
Zanzabum

Answer:

In present state East Tennessee.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do we call the seven parts of the constitution
    14·1 answer
  • Why were keelboats and flatboats important to the early settlers
    8·1 answer
  • N how the other half lives, jacob riis:
    10·1 answer
  • How did entertainers assist the government’s World War II propaganda campaign?
    11·1 answer
  • Which development would best serve as a turning point between two historical periods?
    15·2 answers
  • What conclusion can be made about voting patterns of native-born and naturalized citizens?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the primary purpose of SNCC?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the US support a revolution in Pananа
    14·1 answer
  • The winter winds on the south area subcontinet are called what?
    6·1 answer
  • The 38th parallel is the border between which 2 countries?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!