Answer:
d. Po = $1.80/(0.11 -0.025); The value of D1, is incorrect as $1.80 equals Do.
Explanation:
Calculation to correctly identifies which one of these is an error when computing the current value of this firm's stock
P0 = $1.80/(0.11 - 0.025)
P0 = $1.80/0.085
P0=$9.76
Therefore Based on the information given Po = $1.80/(0.11 -0.025); because The value of D1, is INCORRECT as $1.80 equals Do.
Answer:
Option D. It prepares employees for different positions and jobs that do not exist yet.
Explanation:
The reason is that employee development plan is to equip the existing employee with the skills that will result in increase in the employability and promotion. This will also result in increased motivation, efficiency gaining, better employee decision making, increased employability, promotions, etc. This is more in cards for employees than the employers. Thatswhy it is termed employee development programs.
Answer:
I would pay up to 81.52 dollars for the share that way I will get a 12% return at least
Explanation:
We need to calcualte the present value of the cash flow of each year using the formula for present value of a lump sum:
Dividends Present Value
1st year 3.00 2.678571429 *1
2nd year 4.25 3.38807398 *2
3rd year 106.00* 75.44870627 *3
<em>Value of the share at 12% discount rate 81.51535168</em>
*100 dollars from the sale plus 6 dollars of dividends
*1
Div: 3.00
time: 1
rate: 0.12
PV 2.678571429
*2
Dividends 4.25
time 2.00
rate 0.12000
PV 3.3881
*3
Maturity 106.00
time 3.00
rate 0.12000
PV 75.4487
Answer:
$57,400
Explanation:
The computation of the estimated total manufacturing overhead for the Customizing Department is shown below:
= Total fixed manufacturing overhead cost + Direct labor-hours × Variable manufacturing overhead per direct labor-hour
= $35,000 + 7,000 direct labor hours × $3.20
= $35,000 + $22,400
= $57,400
All other information that is given in the question is ignored.
Answer:
Business slander
Explanation:
Business slander - it is considered to be business defamation when one party used unfair statements toward another competitive partner. This kind of statement is considered to be objectionable when parties comment or try to damage the competitor's reputation for personal interest.
Slander in business gives the right to person to file a civil action against the false statement by another person.