I notice that even though we're working with frames of reference
here, you never said which frame the '5 km/hr' is measured in.
In fact ! You didn't even say which frame the '12 km/hr' of his
bike is measured in.
So there are several different ways this could go. I'll do it the way
I THINK you meant it, but that doesn't guarantee anything.
-- Simon is riding his bike at 12 km/hr relative to the sidewalk,
away from Keesha.
-- He throws a ball at Keesha, at 5 km/hr relative to his own face.
-- Keesha sees the ball approaching her at (12 - 5) = 7 km/hr
relative to the ground and to her.
The distance decreases as the time increases
Answer:
Acceleration is percieved, not constant velocity.
Explanation:
You are most aware when the vehicle is accelerating. At constant velocity you would not be aware of the motion. Only if the system is accelerated the dynamics must be solved considering a pseudo-force (of inertial origin) acting.
It's because of this that:
(A) False. The acceleration can be detected from the inside of a closed car.
(B) False. You would be aware of the motion, but not because humans can sense speed but acceleration.
(C) False. Constant velocity cannot be felt in a closed car.
(D) False. Again, you can't feel constant speed.
nuclear fusion- produces huge amounts of energy.
Answer:
78 percent
Explanation:
I guess that's the right answer
