We know that electrons are negatively charged, so we need to explain why electrons are orbiting the atom in the first place. The only logical explanation for this is by saying that there is a positive charge in the atom somewhere that attracts the negatively charged electrons to the atom.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
1) Avoiding two wars - the war of independence and the war with Canada which was essentially also a war with Britain, possibly also the civil war.
<span>2) Britain abolished slavery before America. </span>
<span>3) Independence was unnecessary, Britain gave up her colonies eventually anyway. </span>
Samuel Gompers was the one who organized it
Answer:
pet, freind, sibling, parent
