Answer:
Patricians were only a small percentage of the population, but they held all the power.
Explanation:
This answer choice best explains class divide by showing how the patricians held most of the power. This creates class conflict as the plebeians feel that they deserve more power and the aristocrats refuse to give up any power.
A is wrong, this would be not be a reason for class divide as all the classes in this scenario would have the same power.
B This suggests class equality if all the social classes could vote equally so its wrong.
D is wrong, it is a statement and more of an effect of class conflict instead of a cause.
A positive way because they stood as a dramatic example of ordinary peasants rigsing up to rid China of the hated foreign presence.
The answer is to prevent a British invasion from the north because it would have been very easy for Britan to destroy them because they were weak in the north.
Every nation has a chief of state, a person who serves as the symbolic leader of the country and represents the nation. In the United States, the president both leads the government and acts as the chief of state, although this is not the case in many countries. As chief of state, the president presides over commemorations of war heroes, throws out the first pitch at baseball games, and attends funerals of world leaders, among other duties.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include the article so we can read it. You neither attach the link of the article, the name of it, or the author. Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Some authors considered Nat Turner as a dangerous man. Some others, as a criminal. Most of them, as a trouble maker.
Ono of those particular articles was published before Turner had been sentenced. So this article tried to influence public opinion, portraying Turner as a criminal, causing so much fury in the community. As was expected, white people demanded harsh punishment for him.
But now we know that the article had a particular agenda. Nat Turner was not an assassin. He was just fighting for his convictions. Turner had led the rebellion of Virginia slaves in August 1831.
