The statement is - false.
Brazil became a Portuguese and not a Spanish colony because the Portugal king that sponsored Columbus was the first to be aware of the discovery. So the Portuguese king called upon the Portuguese-Spanish Treaty by which everything south of the Azores belongs to Portugal. The Pope got involved in it all so that everything is fair and passes by without any conflict, so the Portuguese got everything on the eastern part, while the Spanish got everything on the western part, thus Brazil fell into the arms of Portugal and not Spain.
<span>D. Lacked a unified army. Each colony had a militia which was made up of farmers and untrained men. The colonies had very few common factors pulling them together as a unit. To fight against the British meant fighting without the army that they once belonged or fighting with men that were untrained. Men were asked to join colonial militias which required them to leave their fields and work to fight for a dangerous cause against the British. </span>
They became richer and wealthier off the resources of the lands they colonized
The thing which Charles Lindbergh was advocating in his speech is:
Based on the given speech, we can see that there is the argument made by the speaker in no uncertain terms about the <em>need for the United States</em> to remain neutral and not be drawn into a war which had nothing to do with them.
Furthermore, he believed that the British should not have declared war on Germany if they were <em>not capable of fighting</em> and winning the war without the inclusion of America.
He cited the rising unemployment, the economy, poverty rates which were all internal problems of America and they did not need to be persuaded or cajoled<em> to join the war of Britain.</em>
Read more about Charles Lindbergh here:
brainly.com/question/5853317
