Answer:
Prisonization
Explanation:
Prisonization is the process of socialization whereby prisoners adopt the norms, values, and beliefs of the inmate subculture as their own. Inmate subculture refers to the norms, values, and beliefs that develop among prisoners. Prisoners learn the inmate subculture but they don't associate themselves with correction officers.
Answer: The three sisters important to early American settlers were Squash, Corn and Beans.
Explanation: In addition to nutritional value, the crops would help each other grow. The corn would sprout first and grow tall, which enable the bean plant something to attach to, while both provided shade for the squash plant that grows lower to the ground. The squash plant would cover the ground to keep weeks from attacking the other two plants. Many native American settlers grew these plants together before pilgrims arrived in the 1600's. Nutrition was important, especially in desert areas, like Nevada, where other crops would not grow easily.
Little Albert is a classical study of human conditioning,
ethical or not, whose results were published in 1920. The results state that little
Albert developed a striking fear of fluffy white things. The experiment was significant
because it provided empirical evidence that demonstrated what is called the
classic conditioning in humans.
Answer:
Because Communist China entered the war on North Korea's side.
Explanation:
However, as the Americans moved north toward the Yalu River, the border between North Korea and Communist China, their advance was halted when China entered the fray that fall. In late November, a massive force of Chinese troops sent the Allies into retreat. In early January 1951, the Communists recaptured Seoul, only to have the Allies reoccupy it in March.
Mark me brainliest if I helped:D
Answer:
The Kelo case proved to be a revelation for many New Londoners about their property rights. Small business owners like me have to be especially careful to avoid falling under the radar of government development projects.
Until now, I was under the impression that eminent domain gave the government the right to take private property as long as it was for public use. My assumption included that public use defined anything that the public could literally use. Apparently, the court went with a broader interpretation of public use under which “a taking is constitutional if it serves a public purpose” (Kelo v. City of New London).
This interpretation means public use includes anything that is deemed as fit for public purpose, even though I or most citizens may not be able to directly use it. This raises the concern of what all could fall under public use. I trust that the government won’t go on seizing private properties for its unrestrained use. However, the Kelo case still proves to be a matter of concern for me.
Although the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution provides a certain safeguard, the wider interpretation of public use makes it easier for businesses like mine to lose ownership of their property to the government.
Explanation: