All categories

4 years ago

68 decreased by vanessa’s score is 16

Mathematics

2 answers:

madam [21]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Vanessa's score is 52

Step-by-step explanation:

You can solve this by subtracting the final number from the first number.

- 16

snow_lady [41]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

just add the numbers together

You might be interested in

Alivia is writing the program for a video game. For one part of the game she uses the rule (x,y)➡️(x-3,y+4) to move points on th

Alika [10]

A) the output would be -9,4 because using the rule Alivia created (x,y)➡(x-3,y+4) -6 (which is the x value) subtract 3 equals -9. 0, which is the y value plus 4 equals four.

b) The output would be 0,0 because using the same rule 3 subtract 3 is 0 and -4 plus 4 is 0.

c) Honestly I tried to determine whether the rule was a function and I am having a hard time determining. But I can tell you that x values cannot have more than one y value while y can have more than on x value.

please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!

7 0

3 years ago

Rqw-xeix-ogw Girls come on

Olegator [25]

Answer:

no bro

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Can anyone help me identify the center & radius pls

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a circle centred at the origin is

x² + y² = r² ( r is the radius )

(11)

- 81 + x² = - y² ( add y² to both sides )

- 81 + x² + y² = 0 ( add 81 to both sides )

x² + y² = 81 ← in standard form

with centre = (0, 0 ) and r = $\sqrt{81}$ = 9

(12)

y² + x² - 196 = 0 ( add 196 to both sides )

x² + y² = 196 ← in standard form

with centre = (0, 0 ) and r = $\sqrt{196}$ = 14

7 0

2 years ago

If someone could help u would be amazing!!!!!

GaryK [48]

Tasha's mistake is in Step 4
she has a negative sign in front of the fraction and she has a negative exponent on the 4 in the denominator

3 0

3 years ago

Given the conditional statement ~p -> q which statement is logically equivalent?

icang [17]

Any implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. In other words,

¬p ⇒ q ⇔ ¬q ⇒ p

(¬ means the same thing as ~, "not")

To prove this: recall that

p ⇒ q ⇔ ¬p ∨ q

This is because p ⇒ q is true if p is false, or both p and q are true, i.e.

p ⇒ q ⇔ ¬p ∨ (p ∧ q)

Disjunction (∨ or "or") distributes over conjunction (∧ or "and"), so that

p ⇒ q ⇔ (¬p ∨ p) ∧ (¬p ∨ q)

but ¬p ∨ p is always true, or a tautology, so we're just left with ¬p ∨ q.

Then

¬p ⇒ q ⇔ p ∨ q

… ⇔ q ∨ p

… ⇔ ¬(¬q) ∨ p

… ⇔ ¬q ⇒ p

4 0

3 years ago