Miranda has learned to improve her tennis due to observational learning which is also called social learning. It is a theory that occurs when a beholder’s behavior become different after viewing or observing the behavior of his/her model. He/she can be affected by the positive or negative outcome-called indirect or derivative reinforcement or punishment.
Pratap Singh Shah was the king of the Nepal. He couldn't continue the unification so long because of the political obstacles.
<h3>When did Pratap Singh Shah became king?</h3>
Pratap Singh Shah became the ruler of Nepal in 1775. Pratap Singh Shah ruled for for 36 months, from 1777 to 1779, before passing away at the age of 26 from natural causes. Rana Bahadur Shah, his two-year-old son, succeeded him.
He couldn't unify the territories of the nation because he did not actively participated in the process of the unification like his father who was greatly involved and political crises also didn't allowed to do so.
Learn more about unification here:
brainly.com/question/4979723
#SPJ1
No.
As a charged isn't constrained to give prove in a criminal antagonistic continuing, they may not be addressed by a prosecutor or judge unless they do as such. Be that as it may, should they choose to affirm, they are liable to round of questioning and could be discovered liable of prevarication. As the race to keep up a charged individual's entitlement to quiet keeps any examination or round of questioning of that individual's position, it takes after that the choice of advice in the matter of what proof will be called is an essential strategy regardless in the ill-disposed framework and thus it may be said that it is a legal counselor's control of reality. Surely, it requires the aptitudes of insight on the two sides to be decently similarly hollowed and subjected to an unbiased judge.
By differentiate, while litigants in most affable law frameworks can be constrained to give an announcement, this announcement isn't liable to round of questioning by the prosecutor and not given under vow. This enables the litigant to clarify his side of the case without being liable to round of questioning by a talented resistance. Notwithstanding, this is predominantly on the grounds that it isn't the prosecutor yet the judges who question the respondent. The idea of "cross"- examination is altogether due to antagonistic structure of the customary law.
Judges in an antagonistic framework are unprejudiced in guaranteeing the reasonable play of due process, or basic equity. Such judges choose, regularly when called upon by advise as opposed to of their own movement, what confirm is to be conceded when there is a debate; however in some customary law wards judges assume to a greater extent a part in choosing what confirmation to concede into the record or reject. Best case scenario, mishandling legal carefulness would really make ready to a one-sided choice, rendering out of date the legal procedure being referred to—run of law being illegally subordinated by lead of man under such separating conditions.
Answer:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) administer is the constitutional officer who regulates health and safety issues for workers.
Explanation:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Administers
* Health and safety of the workers comes under OSHA, which take care of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OHS).
* Almost every worker falls under the OSHA <u>but</u> some self-employed people, few transportation workers, miners and public employees, do not falls under their jurisdiction.
* Employers who subject to the OSH Act also have a general duty to provide work and a workplace free from recognized, serious hazards.
* Whistle-blower Protection Program is also looked after by OSHA which make sure that an employer should not go for taking consequent action against those employees who report their concerns related to safety and hazardous situations.
Answer:
vertical social mobility.
Explanation:
Vertical social mobility is a situation when a person move either up or down within a social hierarchy.
In most societies, vertical social mobility is heavily influenced by 2 factors: ownership of Resources and influence. Having more of either of these factors will make a person move up within the social hierarchy, and vice versa.
In the example above, Siting move from the daughter of a shoe shiners into a Neurosurgeon. Her job as a neurosurgeon most likely provided with more salary and influence compared to her shoe shiners parents. This means that she experience an upward move within the social hierarchy.
