Answer:
Background: The idea that everyone should strive to be a ‘productive citizen’ is a dominant societal discourse. However, critiques highlight that common definitions of productive citizenship focus on forms of participation and contribution that many people experiencing disability find difficult or impossible to realize, resulting in marginalization. Since rehabilitation services strive for enablement, social participation, and inclusiveness, it is important to question whether these things are achieved within the realities of practice. Our aim was to do this by examining specific examples of how ‘productive citizenship’ appears in rehabilitation services.
Methods: This article draws examples from three research studies in two countries to highlight instances in which narrow understandings of productive citizenship employed in rehabilitation services can have unintended marginalizing effects. Each example is presented as a vignette.
Discussion: The vignettes help us reflect on marginalization at the level of individual, community and society that arises from narrow interpretations of ‘productive citizenship’ in rehabilitation services. They also provide clues as to how productive citizenship could be envisaged differently. We argue that rehabilitation services, because of their influence at critical junctures in peoples’ lives, could be an effective site of social change regarding how productive citizenship is understood in wider society.
Implications for rehabilitation
‘Productive citizenship’, or the interpretation of which activities count as contributions to society, has a very restrictive definition within rehabilitation services.
This restrictive definition is reflected in both policy and practices, and influences what counts as ‘legitimate’ rehabilitation and support, marginalizing options for a ‘good life’ that fall outside of it.
Rehabilitation can be a site for social change; one way forward involves advocating for broader understandings of what counts as ‘productive citizenship’.
Explanation:
hope it's helpful
Answer:
stimulus generalization
Explanation:
Stimulus generalization: In psychology, the term stimulus generalization takes place in both operant conditioning and classical conditioning. It refers to the process of responding similarly to identical stimuli of formerly conditioned stimuli.
Example: In the given question, the child tends to experience fear whenever the child sees anyone wearing a white coat because during immunization the doctor was wearing a white coat. Hence, the child is experiencing stimulus generalization.
Answer:
By survival
Explanation:
The hunter-gatherer economy focused on survival. They picked berries and hunted animals to live. If they didnt do that, they would die. They depended on the organisms around them.
I believe it would be the FCC since it has to do with the internet
The reason that was not adduced in the text as contributing to the increase in incarceration rates of drug offenders is: additional prosecution penalties for drug activity related to organized crime groups
<h3 /><h3>What was the point of the text?</h3>
In the text that addresses the topic, "Drugs, Health, and Society," the author noted several points that were responsible for the increase in the imprisonment rates of drug offenders.
Several reasons were given to explain this rising phenomenon. Of these, additional prosecution penalties that arose from organized crime groups were not stated.
Learn more about drugs and society here:
brainly.com/question/21174320