1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Makovka662 [10]
3 years ago
10

When you drive a vehicle you own, you must always have _____ with you.

Law
2 answers:
harina [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

probubly  your vehicle registration

Explanation:

natulia [17]3 years ago
4 0

Your licence? or maybe stuff that you might need if they pull you over.

You might be interested in
What can robots do that humans cannot do?
Fynjy0 [20]

Robots can know things instantly as humans can not we at least think about it for 1-90 seconds before we come up with with our answer same as I had to do for yours.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The number of lattes sold daily by two coffee shops is shown in the table.
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Mean for shop A because the data distribution is symmetric; median for shop B because the data distribution is not symmetric

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
01:37:34
____ [38]

Answer:

law enforcement quotas

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In one of his tweets, President Trump wrote about so-called "Obama judges". Chief Justice Roberts responds by saying "there are
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

They are both right because Barack Obama was the one who elected the justices into the Supreme Court but they are of course in no way connected to Barack Obama except for the fact that he was the one who elected them into the court.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is not a precaution to take when hauling a trailer?
    8·1 answer
  • Lois considers herself an act utilitarian. Accordingly, which of the following statements is Lois MOST likely to make?
    9·1 answer
  • In June, Leslie wins a cash prize of $2,000. She plans to use this money to pay her tuition bill in September. Leslie puts this
    9·1 answer
  • Victims can avoid being at fault for being bullied by:
    5·1 answer
  • What is an example of how a crisis response team might help a community in crisis after a violent crime?
    10·2 answers
  • Which part of the U.S constitution outlines the legislative powers?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the first step you would take when planning to collect a firearm in a crime scene?
    14·1 answer
  • Consider systematic discrimination, contextual discrimination, institutional and individual acts of discrimination. Which do you
    11·1 answer
  • What is a skill in law enforcement that helps an officer describe things?
    12·1 answer
  • Keisha is up for promotion in her role. Her boss says she can receive the
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!