Answer:
The dynamics of power between Lady Macbeth and Macbeth are established when Macbeth exercises a certain power in his wife, due to the masculinity and the social roles between men and women within that society. However, it is clearly perceiving the moments that Lady Macbeth takes this power for herself and exerts a strong influence on her husband, due to her sagacity.
Explanation:
In "Macbeth", a play written by Shakespeare, we are introduced to Macbeth and his wife, Lady Macbeth. We can see a very close relationship between these two characters, where a strong power dynamic is established.
Although Macbeth exercises power over his wife, due to the man's social role as head of family and dominant of his wife, established in the society covered in the play. Macbeth loses that power several times during the narrative. This power is lost to his wife, Lady Macbeth, who manages to influence her husband to do all the acts she judges to be right, leading him to even ignore his own thoughts.
In short, we can say that Macbeth's power is established by her masculinity, while Lady Macbeth's power is established by her wit.
Answer:
hope it helps....
Explanation:
A land bridge, in biogeography, is an isthmus or wider land connection between otherwise separate areas, over which animals and plants are able to cross and colonise new lands.
Answer:
Poor working conditions, low wages, and hazards of industrialization
hope this helps mate :)
Due to the external atmospheric pressure. Initially the pressure inside the can is balanced by the atmospheric pressure. But as the air is removed from inside, the external pressure dominates.
In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
