I think it’s 9.10 but I’m not really sure
Answer is C qwertyuiopoiuytrewertyuioiuytrewerty
Answer:
Occam’s razor theory.
Step-by-step explanation:
This theory is known as Occam’s razor theory.
It's a theory based on the principle whereby we give precedence to simplicity. It states that out of two competing theories, the one with the simpler explanation of an object should be embraced over the other. The reason is that the philosopher William of Ockham said that "objects are not meant to be multiplied beyond absolute necessity.”
This definition resonates with what is explained in the question.
Thus, the theory is as explained.
Given the compound statement <span>(p∨q)∧r
where: p: 5 < -3
q : All vertical angles are congruent.
r: 4x = 36, then x = 9.
Recall the in logic, '</span>∨' symbolises "or" while '∧' symbolises "and".
Therefore, the compound statement <span>(p∨q)∧r can be written as follows:
Either 5 < -3 or all vertical angles are congruent, and if 4x = 36, then x = 9.
</span>
The answer is b but I’m not really to sure