What is y divided by 2; y=4

Maddox wants to go back to college full-time. His current employer has agreed to reduce his hours from 40 hours to 25 hours whil

4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

Best fit for his new situation is modified budget A

Step-by-step explanation:

lets first calculate Wages which will be earned by Maddox after reduction of working hours .

from his current situation we can say that ,

for working of 40 hours , Maddox monthly income wages = $1760

so for working of 1 hour , Maddox monthly income wages = $1760÷40=$44

hence for working of 25 hour , Maddox monthly income wages will be $44 × 25 = $1100.

So New wages after reduction of working hours will be $1100. but if you see , in budget B and C , Income wages is considered as $1600 which will not be case after reduction of working hours to 25 . hence Maddox cannot go for Modified Budget B and Modified Budget C.

So he needs to decide between Modified Budget A and Modified Budget D.

Now lets concentrate upon Net income for Modified Budget A and Modified Budget D. Net income for Modified Budget D is in negative that is -$515. that means he need to earn $515 more to meet Budget D , but income wages are fixed that is $1100.

At last lets see Net income of modified budget A. he is able to save $30 , hence we can say that best fit for his new situation is modified budget A

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

There are 7 oak trees in Aidan's yard. The other 2 trees in his yard are maple trees.

Radda [10]

7/9 of his trees are oak trees

6 0

3 years ago

Which equation represents the horizontal line passing through (5, 3)?

Viktor [21]

Step-by-step explanation:

General equation for horizontal line: y = a

Since the point (5, 3) has y-value 3,

the equation of the horizontal line is y = 3.

7 0

2 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

What is 1 + 1???????????????????????????????????????????????????

choli [55]

Answer: 2

Have a good day ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers