The power that Parliament had over Henry VII was The power of the purse, or to spend money when he so chooses.
<h3>Parliamentary power in England</h3>
- It grew over the years and people clamored for more republican rule by the people.
- Extended to controlling the treasury before Henry VIII became king.
As a result of this, Henry VIII could not spend the money as he wished on wars and interests. He solved this problem however, when he seized the riches of the Catholic Church and set up the Church of England.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on Henry VIII at brainly.com/question/6835388.
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
1, most people weren't as knowledgeable back then and FDR wanted to present the plan in terms they would understand and not be overwhelmed by. 2, this one is supposed to be your opinion buuuut: either yes it did make participation inevitable because the opposing nations saw the US gearing up for war and saw that as defensive as opposed to neutral. or no it did not because the US never directly violated the offical postion of neutrality. (hope this helped! good luck!)
Hey you! Here's your answer:
Blank 1 = Foreclosure.
Blank 2 = Diffusion.
I Really Hope This Helped You!
Answer: B) Cross sectional study
Explanation:
Cross-sectional study is defined as the researching method through which population or other subject subset is observed and analyzed at certain period of time to evaluate their behavior.The data is gathered about different different population for assessment.
Other options are incorrect because longitudinal design, cross-lagged panel method or ex-post-facto researching technique is not used for measuring and analyzing the subject at a particular time stamp.Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Answer:
In response, we developed an approach we call the "five C's of historical thinking." The concepts of change over time, causality, context, complexity, and contingency, we believe, together describe the shared foundations of our discipline.
Explanation: