Answer:
The correct answer is Demographic segmentation by Income
Explanation:
In marketing Demographic segmentation implies segmentation of the market in groups by certain factors, like for example, race, age, education, income, religion, etc... to exploit the demographics in their advantage this marketing study helps to identify where would a product or service sell more, or where is convenient to open up a business.
Now in this particular case, Deal$ stores are using income segmentation by selling products of a certain (in this case lower) price, the whole attractive of Deal$ stores is the lower price and not the quality of the products sold there, thats why income segmentation is present, because they are literally aiming at one specific kind of customer that wants really low prices.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
