Leif Erikson. He even has his own day!
Answer:violate the state constitution.
Explanation:good luck
Answer:
A person future experiences
Explanation:
mark me pls i need to level up
This is certainly a sensible topic and I'm afraid there's no easy answer as it's very dependant on context.
The criteria for rejecting or accepting certain immigrants will vary depending on the cultural and political relationship between the country where each immigrant comes from and the country they intend to relocate to.
Every nation should aspire to generate conditions of tolerance in which ethnic or racial differences don't represent a threat to the safety of their communities. To achieve this, it would require governments a sustained effort to educate its people in favor of diversity and apply policies that encourage freedom and protect civil liberties. <u>However, </u>t<u>his is a long and arduous process that history has shown sometimes may take several centuries</u>.
In many cases, the tensions between different ethnicities and cultural backgrounds are so high at the present time, that there's no other way to ensure safety than limiting specific types of immigration in certain regions. That is why to me, it is legitimate for a country to take nationality, race and religion into account when deciding who they let in, as long as the government keeps moving towards tolerance in the long-run.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
They take responsibilities to provide care for the poor and the sick one as a means of involving in governmental activities.
Explanation:
Byzantine empire was the period that mounted two sets of continent of Asia and Europe together between the period of 500-1453 CE.
Moreover,it must be noted that the eastern orthodox church play a key role in government activities because they look to the emperor as government head and a form of God's representative of Christ Jesus inform of a living by providing social needs to the poor and care for the sick through the Monasteries and the convents of the church.
