Answer:
The implied warranty for fitness for a purpose has been breached.
Explanation:
The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose occurs when the seller understands that the product is suitable for carrying out a specific activity and assures the buyer that when purchasing the product the activity will be carried out successfully. This activity is something very specific and is guaranteed with the purchase. As we can see in the question above, the seller assured Carr that the motorcycle he was buying was suitable for the race he wanted to participate in, but that was a lie, since the motorcycle did not have enough power to carry out the race. In this case, we can say that the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose has been violated.
The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
Inductive reasoning is seen as a kind of a process or a method that is known to be used in the drawing of conclusions.
This can be done by going from a particular point to a general point and it is known to be one that is often contrasted with deductive reasoning.
Therefore, based on the above, The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
Learn more about reasoning from
brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
E
Explanation:
Hoffman Air Force Base is near Albuquerque New Mexico and has served as a site for development of guided missiles for long. It was a significant place in World War two efforts after being established inn 1942.
<u>It was at this base that most of the research on the atomic bomb was conducted in secrecy and has been housing nuclear weapons ever since that time.</u>
Development of the primary artillery engineering for the dispatch of the bomb was also done here.
Answer:
(D) corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting
Explanation:
In the American court apparatus, a company may be framed for a crime that the employee committed while working and as a representative of the company. However, if the employee commits a crime during his or her personal routine, which has nothing to do with the company's activities, the company will not be framed in the criminal act. For example, if during work hours a company employee runs over a person, the company may also be held responsible. If an employee runs over a person while off duty, in a particular routine, such as a trip to the mall, only the employee will be penalized.
