Lamar's experience demonstrates retroactive interference.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
When a person tries to recall some information that are older in nature and comes to know about some recent information it refers to Retroactive interference. For instance you may call the name of your grandmother with the name of your mom. There will be a retroactive interference with the two names.
This happens when you forget some tasks that are learnt in past because of the learning of new tasks. In the given example, Lamar only rememnbers the names of the people in the first group and remebers the profession of the last women met by him. His experience demonstrates retroactive interference.
Answer:
$7,000
Explanation:
Depreciation: The depreciation is an expense that shows a reduction in the value of the fixed assets due to tear and wear, obsolesce, usage, time period, etc. It is shown on the debit side of the income statement. It is a non-cash item that does not affect the cash balance.
The computation of the depreciation expense for 2017 is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($78,500 - $8,500) ÷ (10 years)
= ($70,000) ÷ (10 years)
= $7,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
Answer:
Foreign exchange loss
Explanation:
A foreign exchange gain/loss is normal for companies that operate in foreign countries. E.g. you prepared your financial statements by converting the foreign currency into your local currency, in this case you converted Canadian dollars to US dollars. But then the exchange rate between the currencies changes. If the value of the Canadian dollar's value increased after conversion, then you gained, and an adjustment must be made to show that gain. But if the Canadian dollar's value decreased after the conversion, then you lost (what happened here) and an adjusting entry must be made to report the loss.
In order to correct his, you must:
Dr Foreign exchange gain/loss 10
Cr Canadian bank account 10
Answer:
It is preferable to further process Product A.
Explanation:
Product should be processed further before sale if the net incremental benefits from further processing is positive.
The net incremental benefits from further processing is increase in revenue when further processed less further costs of processing.
Increase in revenue=$58,000-$40,000
=$18,000
Further processing costs=$15,000
Net incremental benefits=$18,000-$15,000
Net incremental benefits=$3,000
Since processing further brings a net benefit of $3,000, Product A should be further processed before being sold.
Answer:
Falls:rises.
Explanation:
The MU/P (Marginal Utility/Price) ratio for good X is greater than the MU/P (Marginal Utility/Price) ratio for good Y. To achieve consumer equilibrium, the consumer reallocates dollars from the purchase of good Y to the purchase of good X. If the law of diminishing marginal utility holds, the marginal utility of good X falls and the marginal utility of good Y rises.
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.
Also, the marginal utility of goods and services is the additional satisfaction that a consumer derives from consuming or buying an additional unit of a good or service.
Hence, the marginal utility of good X falls and the marginal utility of good Y rises because the consumer no longer derive satisfaction or benefits (utility) from the consumption of good X while he would switch to good Y for satisfaction.
