(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.
Answer: 592.614
Explanation:
She should spend 592.614 on wants because 592.614 is 30% of 1975.38
Answer:
$6,100
Explanation:
The computation of the net income is shown below:
= Service revenue in trial balance + ( unearned revenue × given percentage) - (rent expense in trial balance) + ( Prepaid rent × 2 months ÷ 12 months) - (wages expense in trial balance + adjusted trial balance)
= $5,000 + ($4,000 × 80%) - ($800 + $3,600 × 2 months ÷ 12 months - ($600 + $100)
= $5,000 + $3,200 - $1,400 - $700
= $6,100
Answer:
Explanation: Ik weet het echt niet en ik ga je plagen met mijn antwoord, ik verwacht niet dat je je moeder afbreekt op zoek naar dit haha.
Answer:
He should set a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT).
Explanation:
Mr. Bailey would be the grantor that transfers the asset into the GRAT, but retains the right to receive annuity payments for a number of years. The IRS has set a minimum annuity corresponding to the Section 7520 rate, during the last two years the rate has varied from 2-3%. When the trust expires (pays all the annuities), the beneficiary gets the asset tax free.
Since the grantor is giving up an asset but in exchange is receiving an annuity form it, there is no applicable gift tax, it is called a zeroed-out GRAT.
This type of grant makes sense only if the grantor believes that the future value of the asset will be higher than the current value, since the annuity is based on the current value. In this case, Mr. Bailey would receive payments based on a $200,000 value, but the property's fair market value is already higher and should increase as time passes.
