All categories

3 years ago

Can someone please help me

Business

1 answer:

Fittoniya [83]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: The answer would be $536.73

Explanation: Add up all the deduction amounts which will equal to 198.51, take away that amount from the 735.24 he earned and it will give you your answer of $536.73.

You might be interested in

Assume that the risk-free rate is 3.5% and the market risk premium is 6%. 1. What is the required return for the overall stock m

Radda [10]

Answer:

9.5 %

17.3%

Explanation:

The market required rate of return = risk free rate + ( Market Beta × Market risk premium)

= 3.5% + (1 × 6%) = 9.5%

The stock required rate of return = 3.5% + (2.3 × 6%) = 0.173 = 17.3%

I hope my answer helps you

6 0

3 years ago

Denber Co. acquired 60% of the common stock of Kailey Corp. on September 1, 2019. For 2019, Kailey reported revenues of $810,000

777dan777 [17]

Answer:

correct option is b. $22,000

Explanation:

given data

reported revenues = $810,000

expenses = $630,000

annual amount of amortization = $15,000

solution

we get here net income 2019 is

net income 2019 = revenue - expenses - amortization ........1

put here value

net income 2019 = $810,000 - $630,000 - $15,000

net income 2019 = $165,000

and

as here acquired stock on September

so we get here income for September to December that is

net income = $165,000 × $\frac{4}{12}$

net income = $55000

and

non controlling interest is

non controlling interest = 40% of $55000

non controlling interest = $22,000

so correct option is b. $22,000

5 0

3 years ago

What are the resources og microeconomics?

VikaD [51]

Answer:

resources like land, tools, money, time, labor and enterprise

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

One of the advantages of having a savings account is that the money can be used for emergency purposes, whereas money in bonds,

valentina_108 [34]

TRUE. Hope this helps!

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A landowner owned a large piece of property containing an inn and a bakery. She entered into a contract to sell the property to

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.

Explanation:

When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.

The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.

Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.

Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.

6 0

3 years ago