All categories

3 years ago

10 < –2b or 2b + 3 > 11

1 answer:

5 0

<span>10 < –2b or 2b + 3 > 11 represents 2 different sets of numbers.

</span><span>10 < –2b can be reduced by dividing both sides by -2; you must then reverse the direction of the < sign: -5 > b, which is the interval b < -5: (-infinity, -5).

</span>2b + 3 > 11 reduces to 2b > 8, which in turn reduces to b > 4: (4, infinity).

It may be helpful to graph these sets.

If you really do mean "<span>10 < –2b or 2b + 3 > 11," then the "solution" is made up of two sub-intervals: b < -5 and b > 4.

</span>

You might be interested in

Is rolling a 3 standard doe and then rolling a sum greater than 4 when counting the next roll an independent event?

zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question, you roll 3 from the standard die and then add it with the next roll to see if the sums are greater than 4.

From this explanation you can see that you use the result from your first roll for the second event, so we can conclude that the event is dependent.

Imagine if we change the result of the first roll into 5, without adding the second roll we can know that the sum will be greater than 4. The first event result will influence the second event, so it is a dependent event.

5 0

3 years ago

If the probability that a person will die in the next year is 613/100,00 What is the

Helen [10]

Answer:

D 99.387%

Step-by-step explanation:

100,000 - 613 = 99,387

99387 / 100,000 is the chance

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

789/548x-89/887=688/8724 find x

Olin [163]

$\frac{789}{548}x- \frac{89}{887}=\frac{688}{8724}$

first we try to semplify as much as possible the fractions.

First we decompose the numbers

789 = 3 * 263

548 = 2 * 2 * 137 = 2^2

they have nothing in common, so the first fraction remains so

89 = 89 (prime number)

887 = 887 (prime number)

they have nothing in common, so the second one remains so

688 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 43 = 2^4 * 43

8724 = 2 * 2 * 3 * 727 = 2^2 * 3 * 727

they have 2^2 (=4) in common, so the numerator and the denominator can be devided by 4

$\frac{688}{8724}= \frac{688:4}{8724:4}=\frac{172}{2181}$

so:

$\frac{789}{548}x- \frac{89}{887}=\frac{172}{2181}$

now we calculate the common denominator

take the scomposition:

548 = 2^2 * 137

887 = 887

2181 = 3 * 727

take every number one time

so the common denominator is 2^2 * 137 * 887 * 727 * 3 = 1'060'131'756

now calculate every single numerator: first we divide each denominator by the common denominator, then we moltiply the result with each numerator

first fraction: 789/548

1060131756 / 548 = 1934547

1934547 * 789 = 1526357583

second fraction: 89/887

1060131756 / 887 = 1195188

1195188 * 89 = 106371732

third one: 172/2181

1060131756 / 2181 = 486076

486076 * 172 = 83605072

now we can delete the common denominator

1526357583x - 106371732 = 83605072

solve it

1526357583x = 83605072 + 106371732

1526357583x = 189976804

x = 1526357583 / 189976804

decompose

1526357583 = 887 * 3 * 3 * 727 * 263

189976804 = 137 * 2 * 2 * 211 * 53 * 31

nothing in common

x = 1526357583 / 189976804

8 0

3 years ago

If remove the zero from 0.76 would it change the value of the number

wariber [46]

Question 1:

<h3>Answer: The number does <u>not</u> change</h3>

Removing the zero from 0.76 leads to .76 which is the same as before. Both lead to $7.6 \times 10^{-1}$ in scientific notation.

Personally I prefer the zero up front to make the decimal point stand out easier. Of course it's just a preference, so its up to you to decide which you prefer.

===========================================

Question 2:

<h3>Answer: Yes the number changes</h3>

Taking the zero out of 10.25 leads to 1.25 which is definitely a different number (and smaller). Therefore, this zero is a significant digit compared to before.

5 0

2 years ago

Help please will mark brainliest

ipn [44]

Answer:

459

Step-by-step explanation:

27 x 17= 459

3 0

2 years ago