1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaK [193]
4 years ago
9

How might partisanship help to diminish the exercise of congressional power of the presidency?

History
2 answers:
VladimirAG [237]4 years ago
7 0

Partisanship creates division among political parties and it is very difficult to come into terms or get an agreement on any proposal because neither side wants to lose.

With this scenario, the President needs to mobilize the members of his party to make things work in Congress. A polarized political situation makes it difficult for the President to pass hiss initiatives in Congress, and congressmen find difficult to pass theirs too for the Presidency's faculty to exercise his veto. Then, the country is in some king of paralysis. None of them have a "free pass" to approve nothing.

In this case, the President travels to the places where their party won the election to ask for the support of partisan voters instead of common citizens.


tamaranim1 [39]4 years ago
5 0
Partisanship can severely limit the congressional power of the president. As part of the executive branch, the president has the ability to veto any law passed by Congress. This means that he can stop it from becoming a law.

However, Congress can override this veto by a 2/3rds vote in both the Senate and House of Representatives. In this case, if there is partisanship in one political party that has a significant majority in each branch of Congress, they can override his vetoes and continue to pass laws without his/her approval.
You might be interested in
Why is it tempting to think that credit cards, and other forms of credit, negate<br> scarcity?
Lynna [10]

Answer:

Credit cards allow families to make purchases in excess of their current income.  Just like for families, there are negative effects of spending more money than the government brings in with revenue.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What value does Frank Wright's work have to us? What measures would you take to preserve his buildings?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Wright's architecture and construction wasn't always perfect, it had leaky roofs and structural problems were often part and parcel of a Wright building. The Johnson Administration Building, Wingspread and Fallingwater are all examples of buildings that exhibited problems after they were built. Despite these flaws, all are in use today, albeit not all for their original purposes.

Whether the prairie style homes of his early period or the Usonian and ultramodern homes of later years, the large estates or the commercial projects of all sorts, Wright's buildings are cherished by many. Numerous groups today are striving to preserve his works, many of which are hitting the century mark or will in the near future, but several challenges and hurdles often lay in their paths. It is amazing what he did, and to be recognized

I don’t know if this helps either sorry.

4 0
4 years ago
PLEAse HElp ME PLeASe
liq [111]

Answer:

Local authorities are multi-purpose bodies responsible for delivering a broad range of services in relation to roads; traffic; planning; housing; economic and community development; environment, recreation and amenity services; fire services and maintaining the register of electors.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How will an aging population likely affect health care in the future?
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

The more people that get older the more imporant health care will be due to the fact that for most cases it is easier for a virus, bacteria etc. to get into a older person's' body and can cause more damage that they may or may not fully recover from

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
It would be easy to dismiss the cold war simply as proof that capitalism was a better theory than communism. easy, but not the w
lakkis [162]

It was stated in the book that “The real force that ended the Soviet Union itself and most especially in the expectations and plans of the new reform leadership that came to power in 1985.” This event led to Mikhail being elected and trying to make new policies, but it didn’t work the way he wanted.

Nationalism was a threat to the Soviet Union, just like what the book said, “"That tenacious nationalism, more than any other factor, crushed their hopes for reform and destroyed the Soviet Union.” That is why I believe that communism went out with only a whimper and not a bang.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one effect of the events in Haymarket Square?
    13·1 answer
  • What book is well known as an example of New Journalism? A. Fahrenheit 451 B. Slaughterhouse-Five C. In Cold Blood D. Armies of
    9·1 answer
  • why do you think state and local governments have a major role in providing important services? why doesn't the federal governme
    14·1 answer
  • Which is the best description of the first settlers in Jamestown?
    10·2 answers
  • What was a purpose of zoning laws?
    7·2 answers
  • This country suffered the heaviest losses of all the central power and were forced to admit that they started the war?
    5·1 answer
  • Help please
    7·1 answer
  • How did the grandfather clause, which was enacted in southern states during Reconstruction, stop certain races of people from vo
    15·1 answer
  • How does power and glory benefit kings and queens
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Which country fought Germany the longest during World War II and remained unoccupied to the end? A. U
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!