The correct answer is A. Both are responsible for communicating with the state governments goodluck
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
as without it you will have a clash between poor and rich and the poor will be trying to be stealing from the rich but you know the government is there
The Moravians and the Highland Scotts introduced Christian religion, although before them, there were already other Christian religions. The Moravians were The Unity of the Brethren <em>missionaries </em>that served the slaves, German immigrants and the Natives in the colony. The Highland Scotts were Presberyterian of the Church of Scotland.
Answer is A.
Answer:
The Kelo case proved to be a revelation for many New Londoners about their property rights. Small business owners like me have to be especially careful to avoid falling under the radar of government development projects.
Until now, I was under the impression that eminent domain gave the government the right to take private property as long as it was for public use. My assumption included that public use defined anything that the public could literally use. Apparently, the court went with a broader interpretation of public use under which “a taking is constitutional if it serves a public purpose” (Kelo v. City of New London).
This interpretation means public use includes anything that is deemed as fit for public purpose, even though I or most citizens may not be able to directly use it. This raises the concern of what all could fall under public use. I trust that the government won’t go on seizing private properties for its unrestrained use. However, the Kelo case still proves to be a matter of concern for me.
Although the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution provides a certain safeguard, the wider interpretation of public use makes it easier for businesses like mine to lose ownership of their property to the government.
Explanation:
No I do not think that they can be responsible of the
wrongdoings of their kids, in light of the fact that any individual of sound
personality is a judicious being. They know when they are carrying out a
wrongdoing and accomplishing something incorrectly. It has nothing to do with
their parents – unless the guardians are overlooking, empowering or partaking
in the wrongdoing; at that point, , should parents be considered responsible of
their youngsters' violations.
