In order to compute for the effective annual rate, the
working equation would be [( 1 + i/n)^n] – 1. The i
corresponds to the nominal rate while n is the number of compounding periods
per year which in this case is 12. The answer would be 5.116%.
Answer:
Ans. Current Share Price=$33.85
Explanation:
Hi, we first have to establish the dividend for the first 3 years and the dividend when the growth rate falls off to a constant rate of 8% with the formula to find the present value of a perpetuity with constant growth rate. From there, we need to bring all the above cash flows to present value and that is the price of the share. The formula is as follows.

To find D1, D2,and D3, we have to do this.
D1=Do(1+0.19)
D2=D1(1+0.19)
D3=D2(1+0.19)
Since 0.19 is the growth rate for 3 years. Everything should look like this

notice that the sign of the last part do not coincide with the formula, that is because the growth rate from the first 3 years is -8%.
Best of luck.
Laura is checking on schedule feasibility.
She is doing everything in order to see whether each phase will run smoothly and according to her schedule. She wants to see if her schedule is possible at all, which is why she is making a timetable to prove her hypotheses.
Answer: Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Coolant (used in the office air-conditioning system) cost = $15,000
Property taxes on factory building = $45,000
Depreciation on trucks = $10,000
Salary paid = $2,000
Period cost = Coolant cost + Depreciation on trucks
= $15,000 + $10,000
= $25,000
Answer:
She was involved in objectionable self-dealing.
Explanation:
Wendy was the president of a business, which made the product she started to make individually at her home, after learning it from the business.
That clearly reflects that the business might have provided the knowledge to Wendy, but using that knowledge in benefit of the self and not of the company, is a unethical act on the part of the individual.
Here Wendy the president of company, rather than promoting the products of the company promoted the products she manufactured individually at her home. This clearly proves that she is self oriented in a negative manner which is a loss for the company.
Her acts are objectionable.