IN THE 2000 UNITED STATES PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, 59.3 MILLION WOMEN VOTED. THAT NUMBER WAS 56% OF THE NUMBER OF THE WOMEN WHO WE
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The level of measurement of each given variable are:
1. Ordinal
2. Nominal
3. Ratio
4. Interval
5. Ordinal
6. Nominal
7. Ratio
8. Interval
Level of measurement is used in assigning measurement to variables depending on their attributes.
There are basically four (4) levels of measurement (see image in the attachment):
1. <u>Nominal:</u> Here, values are assigned to variables just for naming and identification sake. It is also used for categorization.
- Examples of variables that fall under the measurement are: Favorite movie, Eye Color.
<u>2. Ordinal:</u> This level of measurement show difference between variables and the direction of the difference. In order words, it shows magnitude or rank among variables.
- Examples of such variables that fall under this are: highest degree conferred, birth order among siblings in a family.
<u>3. Interval Scale:</u> this third level of measurement shows magnitude, a known equal difference between variables can be ascertain. However, this type of measurement has <em>no true zero</em> point.
- Examples of the variables that fall here include: Monthly temperatures, year of birth of college students
4. Ratio Scale: This scale of measurement has a "true zero". It also has every property of the interval scale.
- Examples are: ages of children, volume of water used.
Therefore, the level of measurement of each given variable are:
1. Ordinal
2. Nominal
3. Ratio
4. Interval
5. Ordinal
6. Nominal
7. Ratio
8. Interval
Learn more about level of measurement here:
The function is 
.
To find the x-intercepts, we need to factorize the function. A very good idea is to first try the factors of 36:
f(1)=1-11+36-36, not 0
f(2)=8-44+72-36=-36+72-36=0. Here we have our first root (2).
Now we cad divide f(x) by (x-2) which will give us a quadratic expression, which we can factorize easily (if the discriminant is non negative).
We can also try some other factors of 36. Indeed we can check that
f(3)=27-99+108-36=135-135=0,
and
f(6)=216-396+216-36=0.
Thus, f(x)=(x-2)(x-3)(x-6). Note that if we expanded the right hand side expression, the constant term would be the product of the constants 2, 3, 6.
This is the reason why in the first place we looked at the factors of 36 for the possible zeros of f(x).
Thus, the x-intercepts are (2, 0), (3, 0), (6, 0), or 2, 3, 6.
The y-intercept is f(0), which is -36.
Note that f(0)<f(2) because f(0)=-36 and f(2)=0. This means that at the left side, the graph is coming from - infinity. Similarly,
we can check that f(10)=1000-1100+360-36=224> f(6). That is, to the right of our rightmost root, the graph is getting larger.
Thus, the end behaviors are: the graph goes to + infinity as x goes to + infinity,
and it goes to minus infinity as x goes to - infinity.
To find the x-intercepts, we need to factorize the function. A very good idea is to first try the factors of 36:
f(1)=1-11+36-36, not 0
f(2)=8-44+72-36=-36+72-36=0. Here we have our first root (2).
Now we cad divide f(x) by (x-2) which will give us a quadratic expression, which we can factorize easily (if the discriminant is non negative).
We can also try some other factors of 36. Indeed we can check that
f(3)=27-99+108-36=135-135=0,
and
f(6)=216-396+216-36=0.
Thus, f(x)=(x-2)(x-3)(x-6). Note that if we expanded the right hand side expression, the constant term would be the product of the constants 2, 3, 6.
This is the reason why in the first place we looked at the factors of 36 for the possible zeros of f(x).
Thus, the x-intercepts are (2, 0), (3, 0), (6, 0), or 2, 3, 6.
The y-intercept is f(0), which is -36.
Note that f(0)<f(2) because f(0)=-36 and f(2)=0. This means that at the left side, the graph is coming from - infinity. Similarly,
we can check that f(10)=1000-1100+360-36=224> f(6). That is, to the right of our rightmost root, the graph is getting larger.
Thus, the end behaviors are: the graph goes to + infinity as x goes to + infinity,
and it goes to minus infinity as x goes to - infinity.
Answer:
0.2514 = 25.14% probability that the diameter of a selected bearing is greater than 85 millimeters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Problems of normally distributed samples are solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean and standard deviation
, the zscore of a measure X is given by:
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
In this question, we have that:
Find the probability that the diameter of a selected bearing is greater than 85 millimeters.
This is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 85. Then
has a pvalue of 0.7486.
1 - 0.7486 = 0.2514
0.2514 = 25.14% probability that the diameter of a selected bearing is greater than 85 millimeters.