G= 2/3ns solve for variable "s"

Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

2, 4, 8, 16, 32

 is non-linear pattern

..........................................

Step-by-step explanation:

--------------------------------------

1st

-4+6=2

2+6=8

8+6=14

14+6=20

3rd

3+3=6

6+3=9

9+3=12

12+3=15

4th

5+4=9

9+4 =13

13+4=17

17+4=21

But 

2nd

2×2=4

4×2=8

8×2=16

16×2=32

5 0

3 years ago

How to do proportions?

finlep [7]

Solving proportions is simply a matter of stating the ratios as fractions, setting the two fractions equal to each other, cross-multiplying, and solving the resulting equation. You'll probably start out by just solving proportions, like this: Find the unknown value in the proportion: 2 : x = 3 : 9.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

En una reunión de 40 viejos piratas, 1/5 tenían una pata de palo y los 3/4 de ellos habían navegado en El Corsario. ¿Cuántos pir

Serga [27]

Answer:

spanish

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What value of x makes this equation true? 5 -3 = +3 A 3 B -9 C -1 D 27

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

-1 I think

Step-by-step explanation:

5-3=2 and -1+3=2

4 0

3 years ago

Each year, more than 2 million people in the United States become infected with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. In p

Bingel [31]

Answer:

A)

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

B)

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Rejected H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

C)

P - value = 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

D)

1) Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given first sample size n₁ = 174

Suppose that, of 174 cases tested in a certain state, 11 were found to be drug-resistant.

First sample proportion

$p_{1} = \frac{x_{1} }{n_{1} } = \frac{11}{174} = 0.0632$

Given second sample size n₂ = 375

Given data Suppose also that, of 375 cases tested in another state, 7 were found to be drug-resistant

Second sample proportion

$p_{2} = \frac{x_{2} }{n_{2} } = \frac{7}{375} = 0.0186$

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

Where

$P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1} +n_{2} }$

$P = \frac{174 (0.0632) + 375 (0.0186) }{174+375 } = \frac{17.9718}{549} = 0.0327$

Q = 1 - P = 1 - 0.0327 = 0.9673

Step(iii):-

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

$Z = \frac{0.0632-0.0186 }{\sqrt{0.0327 X 0.9673(\frac{1}{174 }+\frac{1}{375 } ) } }$

Z = 2.7261

Level of significance = 0.02 or 0.98

The z-value = 2.054

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

P- value

P( Z > 2.7261) = 1 - P( Z < 2.726)

= 1 - ( 0.5 + A (2.72))

= 0.5 - 0.4967

= 0.0033

we will use two tailed test

2 P( Z > 2.7261) = 2 × 0.0033

= 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

8 0

3 years ago