Answer: Someone who knows about the Holocaust ,it might not be a Jews
Explanation: The
Holocaust was an experience that possibly those that experienced it might not be alive to tell the story. It is possible the best person to write this history is not a Jew because there is high tendency that the Jews that existed then might have been killed only those that witnessed the killings will be in the best position to write about it. To me the best person to write about the history of Holocaust is someone who experienced it but not necessarily a Jew
In sociologist daniel rossides's model of the class system of the U.S. the social class that contains the smallest portion of the population is the upper class.
Daniel Rossides was a prominent sociologist who in his book The American Class System : An Introduction to the Social Stratification talks about the model of the class system in detail.
In the model of the class system, he describes the human society using five class model. In his book he uses Weberian idea of class prestige and power.
He claims that a person's position in a social system reflects some combination of their class status and power.
To learn more about class here
brainly.com/question/28212543
#SPJ4
Answer:
is a two-stage overhead cost allocation system that identifies activity cost pools and cost drivers.
Explanation:
Normally two stage allocation cost consists of certain steps. First, it is necessary to identify indirect costs that all the implied departments could carry even including the production department. Then, it would be necessary to calculate al the indirect and direct costs necessary to develop the final product including hours of work, machinery, and all the necessary elements implied for the final development.
Answer:
Dynamic leap study
Explanation:
In this case, Helium Corporation's efforts can be best described as a dynamic leap study. In dynamic leap studies, th question and focus revolves around what alterations must be made between now and then supposing the leap scenario is to come about—the interim time period here is the meaningful focus.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
