Answer:
I do not agree because Mario's claim is not general.
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime numbers: These are a set of numbers that are divisible by 1 and itself only. Examples are: 2, 3, 5, 7. 11 etc.
And a denominator is the divisor in a given fraction.
Considering the following fractions whose denominators are prime numbers:
= 0.66666666...
= 0.142857142
= 0.45454545...
= 0.23076923
= 0.142857142
It could be observed that Mario's claim is not a general principle which is applicable to all fractions with a prime denominator. Thus, I do not agree with his claim.
A property of inverse functions is that if f(x) = a, g(a) = x
F(x) = (5x+1)/x
G(x) = x/(5x+1)
Plug in x = 3.
F(3) = 16/3
G(16/3) = 16/83. Since it doesn’t equal 3, it’s not an inverse function
Answer:
the least common denominator is 54 although there are some that are higher ones
Step-by-step explanation:
If I put this into an equation it would look like 2x+2= 66. 66-2= 64. You do this because to get x you have to reverse the equation, but you have to do the number not connected to x first. Then 2x= 64. So you divide 64 by 2 which is 32. So Jordan is 32 years old. Hope this helped!
Answer:
<u><em>F(x)= 5*[
+ (a*b)*
+ a*b*x + C.</em></u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>First step we aplicate distributive property to the function.</em></u>
<u><em>5*(x+a)*(x+b)= 5*[
+x*b+a*x+a*b]</em></u>
<u><em>5*[
+x*(b+a)+a*b]= f(x), where a, b are constant and a≠b</em></u>
<u><em>integrating we find ⇒∫f(x)*dx= F(x) + C, where C= integration´s constant</em></u>
<u><em>∫^5*[
+x*(a+b)+a*b]*dx, apply integral´s property</em></u>
<u><em>5*[∫
dx+∫(a*b)*x*dx + ∫a*b*dx], resolving the integrals </em></u>
<u><em>5*[
+ (a*b)*
+ a*b*x</em></u>
<u><em>Finally we can write the function F(x)</em></u>
<u><em>F(x)= 5*[
+ (a*b)*
+ a*b*x ]+ C.</em></u>