Yes, in the sense that the new area could be written as (x+1)^2 / 1.
Usually we would not bother with the "1" as divisor.
Let's actually do the work: what is the area of the square if we increase the side length of the existing square by 1 ft?
(x+1)^2 = x^2 + 2x + 1 (This is not a fraction, and thus not the ratio of
two integers, which, in turn, is the definition of
"rational number."
Answer:
the horizontal is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>the</em><em> </em><em>reason</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>bec</em><em>ause</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>hori</em><em>zontal</em><em> </em><em>lines</em><em> </em><em>goes </em><em>up</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>down </em><em>which</em><em> </em><em>has</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>no</em><em> </em><em>slope</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>all</em><em> </em><em>it's </em><em>almost</em><em> </em><em>like</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>wall</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Answer:
(D)
Step-by-step explanation:
When graphed, the lines do not cross at any point. There is a picture of this below.
The system has no solution.
Answer:
x < 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1 :
Equation at the end of step 1 :
-2 • (x - 5) - 4 > 0
Step 2 :
Step 3 :
Pulling out like terms :
3.1 Pull out like factors :
6 - 2x = -2 • (x - 3)
Equation at the end of step 3 :
-2 • (x - 3) > 0
Step 4 :
4.1 Divide both sides by -2
Remember to flip the inequality sign:
Solve Basic Inequality :
4.2 Add 3 to both sides
x < 3
Inequality Plot :
4.3 Inequality plot for
-2.000 X + 6.000 < 0
One solution was found :
x < 3
Processing ends successfully
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Answer:
the ratio is 10:12 and if you were to write it in a fraction you get 10/12 which can be simplified as 5/6