1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
9

Explain how ethical dilemmas are evaluated and resolved, what factors are involved?

Law
1 answer:
kodGreya [7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

By mutual understanding and cooperation.

Explanation:

Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.

You might be interested in
Question 10
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

Federalism

Explanation:

Both share power

6 0
3 years ago
Tools
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Appeal:

An appeal is the process of making a formal request to a higher (appellate) court to reverse a lower court’s decision after the lower court has made a final judgment or ruling. Often, the losing party files an appeal with the higher court; this begins the appellate review process. An appellate court reviews the facts as presented in the trial, and no other evidence is considered in making an appellate decision. The main purpose of an appeal is to review the legal decisions made at the trial court level.

Appellant:

An appellant is the party to a lawsuit who is seeking an appeal from a lower court decision. The appellant is typically the party who lost at the trial court level. The appellant must file a notice of appeal and offer a legal brief to the appellate court, putting forth its legal arguments and its legal basis for the appeal.

Appellee:

An appellee is the party who wins the judgment at the trial court level. The appellee must respond to the appellant’s legal arguments by filing a legal brief and appear in court, if necessary, to argue to the appellate court why the lower court decision should not be disturbed.

Harmless error:

Harmless error is an error allegedly made by a lower court judge that an appellate court finds insufficient to alter or amend the lower court’s decision. The error is deemed “harmless” because reconsideration of the alleged error would have no bearing on the outcome of the lower court’s decision. An example of a harmless error would be a technical error made by the lower court that, under the applicable law, was improperly decided; yet, the remaining evidence substantially supports the original judgment.

Injunction:

An injunction is an order issued by the court which orders a party to do something or prohibits the party from doing something. An injunction may be proper when a party may be harmed by another party’s threatened actions.

Interlocutory appeal:

An interlocutory appeal is a type of appeal that seeks the review of a temporary order (such as an injunction) that is related to a pending lawsuit. An interlocutory appeal is filed and heard while the underlying action is still proceeding at the trial court level.

Mandamus:

A mandamus action is an order issued by a court that orders a governmental body or public agency to perform an act required by law. Often, a mandamus action is sought when a governmental body or public agency fails or refuses to act under an applicable law.

Writ of certiorari:

A writ of certiorari is a type of judicial order from an upper level court to a lower court (for example, the U.S. Supreme Court to a U.S. Court of Appeal) to send the court record and related documents of a particular case to the higher court for its review. A writ of certiorari is typically associated with the review of lower court decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court or state supreme courts. The appealing party must file a writ of certiorari (also sometimes referred to in short hand as “cert”) to the higher court, which may agree to review the lower court's decision ("granting certiorari") or may refuse to review the lower court's decision ("denying certiorari").

4 0
3 years ago
What is the hypothisus of the bisector of the unitcery akg 4k for?
Alika [10]

Answer:

the 4k comes to help the akg

Explanation:

well, its pretty simple

the akg does this and that, and then bam!

5 0
3 years ago
What are the purposes of political parties? Please give an example
coldgirl [10]

Answer: purpose : is to  have  electoral strength sufficient to permit it to win control of a government usually with comparative regularity and when defeated to constitute the principal opposition to the party in power.

Example :   Democratic Party.

Republican Party.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Select the examples that best demonstrate likely tasks for Professional Support Services workers. Check all that apply. Leon giv
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer: 1, 3, 4

Explanation:

i took the test

6 0
3 years ago
Read 3 more answers
Other questions:
  • Besides the magistrate court, which other trial court does not have jury trials? Why do you think this court doesn't have jury t
    9·1 answer
  • A loophole that many green-collar criminals have found with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is that it only protects the anim
    14·1 answer
  • This is the power of a court to review a law or an official act of a government employee or agent for constitutionality or for t
    15·2 answers
  • What two situations must occur to appeal to a higher court in a criminal case?
    6·1 answer
  • Legislative Branch
    5·1 answer
  • The following question refers to a hypothetical situation. Polls show that the country overwhelmingly agrees that we need a high
    14·1 answer
  • What are the 3 appendices?
    10·1 answer
  • which 1972 supreme court case determined that the death penalty was unconstitutional for violating the 8th amendment?
    10·1 answer
  • 56 points easy. !!!!?????
    5·1 answer
  • the u.s. supreme court enabled which government practices to continue in its ruling in plessy v. ferguson?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!