Answer:
For long it has been the received opinion that judges filled in the gaps left by rules by using their discretion. Positivistic jurisprudence from Austin to Hart placed strong emphasis on the part played by judges in the exercise of their discretion. "In these cases it is clear", Hart has said, "that the rule-making authority must exercise discretion, and there is no possibility of treating the question raised by the various cases as if there were one uniquely correct answer to be found, as distinct from an answer which is a reasonable compromise between many conflicting interests". A competing view was espoused by the realists who placed absolute emphasis on the discretion of judges and relegated the "rules" to an obscure position. Earlier, little attention was paid to the analysis of discretion. However, a determined effort has been made lately by Ronald Dworkin, who has cast serious doubts on the orthodox opinion and has emerged as the principal opponent of Hart. Dworkin's views have posed a sustained challenge to the positivist account and have received critical acclaim by leading jurists of the world.
Answer: Why your settling it, who it is being settled with, do you have the right accountablility, and are you going to lose anything after settling it.
Explanation:
Answer:
(a)- Speech that constitutes a direct personal provocation.
Explanation:
The first constitutional amendment refers to freedom of expression, religious freedom and the prohibition of censorship. This amendment also states that the entire population is free to make any demonstration and protest to any governmental sphere and any ruler, provided it is a peaceful protest. Based on this, we can say that the first constitutional amendment prohibits the formation of a clergy to offer non-denominational prayers in public high school formations, polygamy, as long as it is part of traditional religious practice and the establishment of schools to require Jehovah's Witnesses salute the flag Schools exempt Amish children from public education requirements
.
However, the first amendment allows a speech to be given that constitutes a direct personal provocation.
Answer:
D. Everyone deserves health care even if he or she can't afford to pay for it.
Explanation:
I'm actually under Medicaid myself. It is there to help everyone young old rich poor it is there for the people to help them with getting medical care without the big price tag of the average vists.
