Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The Victoria's part is true she is pursuing cost leadership by keeping it's price low although the Walmart's example is not related to differentiation strategy of competitive advantage. Because keeping mix of products is not differentiation, it's not unique.
- Porter suggested 4 strategies and he believed that by using one of these strategies companies can gain <em>competitive advantage. </em>
The 4 strategies for competitive advantage:
- Cost Focus.
- Cost leadership.
- Differentiation Focus.
- Differentiation Leadership.
Answer:
Will the financial statements of a company always differ when different choices at the start of the accounting period are made regarding the denominator-level capacity concept?
A. No. It depends on how a company handles the production-volume variance in the end-of-period financial statements. For example, if the adjusted allocation-rate approach is used, each denominator-level capacity concept will give the same financial statement numbers at year-end.
Explanation:
Level capacity strategy
The organisation manufactures or produces at a constant rate of output ignoring any changes or fluctuations in customer demand levels. This often means stockpiling or higher holdings of inventory when customer demand levels fall
Answer:
Charlie's Wood Works
a. The percentage of Janitorial costs that should be allocated to the Assembly Department is:
= 58%
The percentage of Security costs that should be allocated to the Cutting Department is:
= 70%
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Departments Cutting Assembly Total
Square feet 33,600 46,400 80,000
Percentage based on
square feet 42% 58% 100%
Assets $140,000 $60,000 $200,000
Percentage based on
assets 70% 30% 100%
Bases for the allocation of service departments costs:
Janitorial department = Square feet
Security department = asset value
Answer and Explanation:
(A) In the event that U1 = C1 and U2 = C2,
at that point two get both same utility C1 must equal to C2
C1 + C2 = 90
substituting C1 in the place of C2 in the above equation we get
2C1 = 90
C1 = 90/2
C1 = 45
C2 = 45
Each one has utility = 45
(B) U1 = U2
C1(c1/c2) = c1*c2
c1 = c2^2
c1 + c2 = 90
substituting c1 = c2^2 in c1 + c2 = 90
c2^2 + c2 = 90
c2 = 9
c1 = 81
U1 = U2 = 981 = 729
(C) U1 = u2
(C1 - 5)({c1 - 5}/{c2 + 5}) = (c1 - 5)(c2 + 5)
C1 - 5 = (c2 + 5)^2
C1 - 5 = c2^2 + 25 + 10c2
C1 = c2^2 + 30 + 10c2
90 = c2^2 + 30 + 10c2 + c2
0 = c2^2 - 60 + 11c2
C2 = 4,-15
-15 not possible C2 = 4
C1 = 90 - 4 = 86
U1 = U2 = 729
(D) Due to satisfy their principle, gift decrease the consumption of individual 2 by same amount and Increase consumption of individual 1 by same amount.
What kind of rings? In which way? Is it a figure of speech?
