All categories

3 years ago

Can someone help me with solving volume equations?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Helen [10]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

For 2, 30 cubic m., For 3, 90 cubic cm., For 4, 1000 cubic yards, for 5, 27 cubic mm., For 6, 120 cubic in.

Step-by-step explanation:

You can simply multiply all 3 sides to get the cubic volume B x h is the same as l x w x h

ex. Number 2, length 3, width 2, height 5

Base is 2x3=6 times 5 = 30 or 2 x 3 x 5=30

You might be interested in

What is the common factor of 10 15and 35

anygoal [31]

Answer:

the common factor of all the numbers is 5

7 0

3 years ago

Can someone answer this question please answer it correctly if it’s corect I will mark you brainliest

lana [24]

Answer:

1/21

Step-by-step explanation:

Cards: 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 7 cards

1st card :5

P(5) = number of 5's / total

= 1/7

Then we keep the card

Cards: 2,3,4,6,7,8 only 6 cards left

card less than 4: 2,3

P (card less than 4) = number of cards less than 4/ total cards

= 2/6 = 1/3

P (5, no replacement, card less than 4) = P(5) * P( less than 4)

= 1/7 * 1/3

=1/21

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For a specific species of fish in a pond, a wildlife biologist wants to build a regression equation to predict the weight of a f

sashaice [31]

Answer: First of all, we will add the options.

A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.

C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.

D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.

The correct option is D.

Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.

3 0

3 years ago

Is it necessary to do all of the calculations to determine the sign of the product? Why or why not?

Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

= (- 475)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

(-5) × (-5) × ... × (-5) = (-5)95

Find:

Sign of the product

Computation:

(-5) × (-5) × ... × (-5) = (-5)95

= (- 475)

No, it is not compulsory to do all calculation to find sigh of product

Negative number × odd time = Negative number

Negative number × even time = Positive number number

6 0

4 years ago

Fabio is driving west away from Albany and towards buffalo along interstate 90 at a constant rate of speed of 62 miles per hour.

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

The distance between Albany and Buffalo along the I90 is 288.8 mi.

The speed of Fabio is 62 mph.

After 1.5 hours, he is 221 miles from Albany.

Things we can calculate here:

Using the relation:

Distance = time*speed.

We can calculate the number of miles that he moved in that 1.5 hours.

D = 62mph*1.5h = 93mi.

If after 1.5 hours, he was 221 miles Albany, then before that he was 93 miles closer to Albany.

His initial position was:

221 - 93 = 128 miles away from Albany.

Now we also can calculate the time left to arrive at Buffalo.

We know that the distance between Albany and Buffalo is 288.8 mi

And he is 221 mi away from Albany.

Then the distance left to Buffalo is:

288.8mi - 221mi = 67.8mi

And the time left will be:

Distance/speed = time

67.8mi/62mph = 1.1 hours.

He needs to drive for another 1.1 hours to get to Buffalo.

7 0

3 years ago