A plain known as g<span>rand prairie.</span>
Answer:
the answer is B. hope i could help yall :)
Answer: This is a " WORD-FOR-WORD PLAGIARISM".
Explanation: Word-for-word plagiarism is a type of plagiarism were someone copies another person's work word-for-word, without acknowledging the source it is been copied from.
The student has copied the original source word-for-word without acknowledging the source. The word been copied is "where variables are measured separately and then a mathematical model is chosen to portray the relationship among the variables". Which is the same in both version.
Though the student has used it in a different form to describe and define a different context from the main source. It is still plagiarism, because the student has copied it from the main source without acknowledgement
The answer to your question is,
D. have committed themselves to values and goals without exploring alternatives
-Mabel <3
Answer:
Listeners can become lost
Explanation:
Informative speakers need to judge their audience before they speak. They need to know some facts about their listeners, where do they come from, from which background socially and ethnically, and they may want to know something about their religion or interests. This way they can judge the level of the audience's knowledge about the subject they will speak upon.
If the informative speakers overestimate the listeners' knowledge on a particular subjects, the listeners will become frustrated because they won't understand what the speakers are telling them. They may consider themselves to stupid or not knowledgeable enough to listen to this speech. After trying to understand, they give up in the end and <em>can become lost</em>, not understanding the speaker and the topic he speaks upon.
