1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zanzabum
3 years ago
5

In which of the following courts does a defendant NOT have a right to a public defender?

Law
2 answers:
Ket [755]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

jury

Explanation:

Dimas [21]3 years ago
3 0
When a public defender is assigned it goes by your income. If you make to much in any court system they will make you hire an attorney. Also if there is a victim in the case who uses a city agency 9 times out of 10 they assign you court appointed counsel. Not all courts ask for verification of income to see who should qualify for a pd and who doesn’t.
You might be interested in
Before a sport manager is liable for negligence, the plaintiff must show that the sport manager owed the plaintiff a duty of car
morpeh [17]

Answer:

D: All of the above

Explanation:

Before a sport manager is liable for negligence, the plaintiff must show that the sport manager owed the plaintiff a duty of care. A legal duty of care arises from a relationship inherent in a particular situation, a voluntary assumption of the duty of care, and a duty mandated by a law.

5 0
3 years ago
Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representa
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.

3 0
3 years ago
Answer pl
garik1379 [7]

Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.

<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>

Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.

Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.

So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.

Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909

7 0
2 years ago
A grand jury...
gladu [14]

Answer:

b, determines guilt or innocence

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Who was the first president of UK​
MArishka [77]
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"

I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.

For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.

Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is the most important speech given at the national convention?​
    5·1 answer
  • Law enforcement agencies such as the fbi are part of
    6·2 answers
  • This was a law created in 1887 to regulate railroads to ensure fair rates
    6·1 answer
  • LUS5ULL 14 Assigen
    12·1 answer
  • 8. Why do all drug cases have to have the drugs analyzed before court?
    11·2 answers
  • East Coast Furniture is considering submitting a proposal for a $50,000
    7·1 answer
  • Write a 3-5 sentence essay answering the following question.
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement is true?
    14·1 answer
  • At the four-way stops sign, which has the right to go first?
    8·1 answer
  • In contract law, the term consideration refers to the serious thought that underlies a party's intent to enter into a contract.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!