The National Origins Act of 1924 aimed to regulate both the amount and quality of immigrants to the United States in an effort to stop further eroding of the ethnic composition of American society.
The 1924 Immigration Act, which was a legislative expression of the xenophobia that swept through America throughout the 1920s, especially with regard to immigrants from eastern and southern Europe, was passed by the House on this day in 1924. The first total numerical immigration quota, which applied to almost 350,000 persons in 1921, was eventually reduced to 165,000 in 1924. The 1924 statute established annual limits for each country based on the number of foreign-born Americans from each European country who resided in the United States in 1890. While severely restricting immigration from southern and eastern Europe and outright banning it from nearly all of Asia, Congress devised an extraordinarily tight system of ethnic quotas in 1924, which effectively ended mass immigration for decades.
Learn more about Act of 1924 from
brainly.com/question/1916562
#SPJ4
I think it’s $2,800 per election not truly sure.
New Jersey v. TLO is the case would most likely be cited by his lawyer.
<h3>What is New Jersey v. TLO?</h3>
According to the Juvenile Court's ruling, a school official may check a student if they have a reasonable suspicion that a violation has been or is being committed, or if they have a good basis to think that the search is required to uphold school rules or maintain discipline. The Court determined that the school administrator's search did not violate the Fourth Amendment after applying this criterion to the circumstances of this case. T.L.O. received a one-year probationary period after being deemed delinquent.
Remanded the matter back to the Juvenile Court to determine whether T.L.O. had intentionally & voluntarily waived her Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. Affirmed the Juvenile Court's finding that there was no Fourth Amendment violation.
To know more about New Jersey v. TLO, visit:
brainly.com/question/11169658
#SPJ1
Answer:
The main comparative difference between a federal state and a confederate state lies in the role of the sub-national entities of each. Thus, in a federation, it is the federal state that has sovereignty over sub-national entities, which cannot secede or nullify federal laws, that is, they are in a clear position of inferiority with respect to the federation. For their part, in confederation, sub-national entities remain sovereign, that is, with the full capacity to make decisions on their own, including the rights of secession and nullification; with which the confederate state is rather a central point of debate between the different sovereign states that make up the confederation.
