Answer:
1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the recessive gene is carried in the x chromosome and a father can only pass it to a daughter, the father doesn't have the disease nor carries it.
The mother carries the recessive gene because her father passed her his conditioned gene (only having one x chromosome), while her mother gave her a normal one so she can have normal vision.
The chance of having a boy or a girl is 1/2 and the chance of this baby of having both recessive gene is null because in order to have a girl that is color blind both her x chromosomes must have the recessive gene, but the father can't pass it since he doesn't carries it. Therefore the combined probability is 1/2*(1-0) = 1/2.
Using translation concepts, the graph of f(x) is given at the end of the answer.
<h3>What is a translation?</h3>
A translation is represented by a change in the function graph, according to operations such as multiplication or sum/subtraction either in it’s definition or in it’s domain. Examples are shift left/right or bottom/up, vertical or horizontal stretching or compression, and reflections over the x-axis or the y-axis.
The parent absolute value function is given by:
f(x) = |x|
Which has the graph in the format of a V centered at the origin.
The translated function is given by:
g(x) = -1/2|x + 4| + 2.
The translations are as follows:
- Reflection over the x-axis, due to the multiplication by the negative number, thus the V is pointing down now.
- Vertical compression by a factor of 2, due to the division by 2.
- Shift left of 4 units, as x -> x + 4.
- Shift up of 2 units, as y -> y + 2.
Due to the last two translations, the graph is now centered at (-4,2) and is given at the end of the answer.
More can be learned about translation concepts at brainly.com/question/4521517
#SPJ1
Answer:
The first one (Cedric is correct because he used the inverse of subtraction and added 4.5)
Step-by-step explanation:
First....I'll do it my way
z - 4.5 = -1.5
Add 4.5 on both sides
z - 4.5 + 4.5 = -1.5 + 4.5
z = 3
This should be our answer.....and so who did it right?
Cedric did
Which is the true statement?
Cedric is correct because he used the inverse of subtraction and added 4.5
Hope this helped!
Have a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious day!
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
This triangle has been scaled down from triangle one to triangle two. I didn't have a lot of study on this subject, but the answer that makes most sense to me would be B if you want to keep the triangles proportional
X^3/x^2
using the identity, a^b/a^c = a^(b-c)
x^3/x^2 = x^(3-2) = x^1 = x
