That is:
Forty-five thousand, five hundred seventy-two.
~Deceptiøn
Answer:
The second one:
L∪J={i,j,k,l,m,n,o}
Step-by-step explanation:
The union is the elements listed in either set.
So since l,m,n, and o are elements of set L, they will also be elements of whatever it is "unioned" with.
Since i,j,k,l and m are elements of set J, they will also be elements of whatever it is "unioned" with.
When you write the union, just be sure to include each element that occurs in either set once.
So the union of L and J is {i,j,k,l,m,n,o}.
The answer is the second one.
The intersection would actually be that upside down U thing, the ∩ symbol. The intersection of two sets is a list of elements that both sets include. So here the intersection would just consist of the elements l amd m.
Answer:
y=10
Step-by-step explanation:
x=2
3x2= 6
6+4 = 10
(-2^3) = -8.
-2 times 3 = -6.
The expression is now -6 - (-8).
-6 + 8 = 2.
The answer should be 2.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim to be tested is:
The mean respiration rate (in breaths per minute) of students in a large statistics class is less than 32.
To test this claim the hypothesis can be defined as follows:
<em>H₀</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> = 32.
<em>Hₐ</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is less than 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> < 32.
The sample mean respiration rate of students is 31.3.
According to the claim the sample mean is less than 32.
The sample mean value is not unusual if the claim is true, and the sample mean value is also not unusual if the claim is false.
Thus, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
