Answer: In New York v. Quarles (1984), the Supreme Court created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda rule. Under Miranda v. Arizona, if an officer interrogates a suspect without notifying him of his Fifth Amendment rights, evidence gathered from that interrogation cannot be used in court.
Explanation: jihuiygbhjnhgvjbj
Answer:
<em>Here</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>your </em><em>answer</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>h</em><em>ope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>useful </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em>.</em>
I think that a territory could become a state when it reaches a population of 150,000.
Answer:
This is an example of latent learning.
Explanation:
Latent learning is the<em> retention of information</em> without much help or motivation. This is an unconscious process; one tends to "just know" the information.
In this case, the person regularly goes to the store and he has seen where the eggs are, <em>unconsciously retaining</em> this information and thus knows where they are when he goes to buy it for his guests. This is an example of latent learning.
Answer and Explanation:
Phelps criticized Friedman's position, because he said it was totally irrelevant to analyze the tax functions of inflation without assessing product demand, as Friedman suggested in his theory. He stated that this would only be possible if there was a way to predict an optimal rate of inflation in different situations of demand and supply, otherwise, in Phelps' words it would be the same as "Professor Friedman gave us Hamlet without a prince".
Phelps' positioning would be better considered by the RBC model, since this model is based on real and not imaginary facts.