Answer:
The correct answer is Greg. He is the agent.
Explanation:
First of all, the term <em>agent</em>, in business, is understand as the individual that currently <em>manages another person's business affairs</em> and that commonly spend much of his time negotiating contracts for his clients.
Secondly, according to the definition of agent, it is understandable that in this case the agent is Greg due to the fact that he is the one that has to sell the collection, under Michael's orders.
Answer:
275
Explanation:
You will add all the figures;that is;44+67+91+18+55=275
One single payment of money, opposed to a an annuity. (a series of payments made over time)
True, With relationship selling the salesperson would spend most of his or her contact time with the prospect talking about the product, hoping to close the sale.
<h3>What is the difference between relationship selling and consultative selling?</h3>
The difference between relationship selling vs. consultative selling is that relationship selling consists of building a relationship with a customer over a long time and then relying on that relationship for sales as opposed to short-term gains and creating an interest in the customer in consultative selling
To learn more about relationship selling, refer
brainly.com/question/28120879
#SPJ4
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>