All categories

3 years ago

What role does organizing play as a function of management?

Business

2 answers:

larisa86 [58]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Role does organizing play as a function of management is discussed below.

Explanation:

ORGANIZING:

Organizing is the role of management that includes and involves forming an organizational construction and allotting human support to guarantee the achievement of intentions.

Arrangements made about the variety of jobs within the organization are commonly described as "job design" arrangements.

mote1985 [20]3 years ago

4 0

If management implements proper organization and <span>productivity will be higher,.
Proper organization refers to placing the Right people to do the right job, employee moral will make the employees have positive attachment to the company which will make them do their best to bring a good contribution for the company.</span>

You might be interested in

Smaller bags of items are generally priced lower per unit than larger bags.

Pepsi [2]

<span>B. FALSE yes
Hi
GOOD BYE

</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Bruce is a single father with 1 child. He can work as a bagger at the local grocery store for $6 per hour up to 1,200 hours per

serg [7]

Answer:

$16,440

Explanation:

If Bruce is able to work 600 hours per year, his salary will be $3,600 (= $6 x 600), but he will lose $2,160 (= $3,600 x 60%) of welfare stipend.

His total welfare stipend is $15,000 if he is not able to work during the year.

Bruce's total income = $15,000 + $3,600 - $2,160 = $16,440

4 0

3 years ago

Asset A and B have expected returns of 5% and 3% per year respectively. Their annual volatilities are both 20% and the correlati

Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

1. Weight of A=0.5, Weight of B= 0.5

2. Asset A has the highest shape ratio. The weight of A and B in the optimal risky portfolio that has the highest shape ratio is:

Weight of A= 0.105, Weight of B= 0.895

Explanation:

Expected return of Asset A= 5%Expected return of Asset A= 5%

Expected return of Asset B= 3%

Annual volatilities of Asset A= 20%

Annual votalities of Asset B= 20%

1. Correlation coefficient = 30% = 0.3 < 1

Risk Free Rate = 1% =0.01

1. Weight of A and B in portfolio with minimal risk is:

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Therefore,

CovXAXB = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2

= 0.012

Hence,

Weight of A= (0.2)^2 - 0.012 / (0.2)^2 + (0.2)^2 - 2(0.012)

Weight of A= 0.04 - 0.012 / 0.04 + 0.04 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.08 - 0.024

= 0.028/ 0.056

=0.5

Weight of A = 0.5

Weight of B= 1 - Weight of A

Weight of B= 1 - 0.5

Weight of B= 0.5

2. Shape ratio of A= RA - Rf / β

= 0.05 - 0.01 / 2

= 0.04/2

= 0.02 =20%

Shape ratio of B= RB - Rf / β

= 0.03 - 0.01/ 2

0.02 / 2

=0.01 = 10%

So, Asset A has the highest shape ratio

Cov (XAXB) = PAB (Volatility of A) (Volatility of B)

= 0.03 × 0.2 × 0.1

= 0.006

Weight of A= β^2B - Cov (XAXB) /β^2A + β^2B - 2Cov (XAXB)

Weight of A = (0.1)^2 - 0.006 / (0.2)^2 + (0.1)^2 - 2(0.006)

= 0.01 - 0.006 / 0.04 +0.01 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.05 - 0.012

= 0.004/ 0.038

= 0.105

Weight of A = 0.105

Weight of B= 1 - 0.105

Weight of B= 0.895

3 0

3 years ago

Brian Cartwright is a single taxpayer who itemizes deductions and has no dependents. Since Year 1, Brian has owned a 50% interes

ankoles [38]

Answer:

Following are the solution to the given points:

Explanation:

For point 1:

$=\$22500\times 50\%\\\\=\$22500\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$112500$

For point 2:

$=\$48000\times 50\%\\\\=\$48000\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$24000$

For point 3:

$=\$5000\times 50\%\\\\=\$5000\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$2500$

For point 4:

$=\$20000\times 50\%\\\\=\$20000\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$10000$

For point 5:

$=\$40000\times 50\%\\\\=\$40000\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$20000$

For point 6:

$=\$3000 \times 50\%\\\\=\$3000 \times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$1500$

For point 7:

$=\$6000\times 50\%\\\\=\$6000\times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$3000$

For point 8:

$=\$1000 \times 50\%\\\\=\$1000 \times \frac{50}{100}\\\\=\$500$

8 0

3 years ago

At december 31, 2018,stevenson company overstated ending inventory by $36,000. how does this error affect cost of goods sold

jarptica [38.1K]

The Cost of Good Sold is $36,000 lower than it should have been and the net income is $36,000 higher than it should have been.

There are two formulas that are important to know for this question. The first is Beg. Inventory + Purchases - Ending Inventory = COGS. The second formula is Sales - Cost of Good Sold = Gross Profit.

If you reported a higher ending inventory it is going to result in a lower value for Cost of Good Sold. In this case the company had too high of an ending inventory by $36,000, which mean that the COGS is $36,000 lower than actual.

When you have a COGS that is lower than it should be you are going to have a gross profit which is overstated. The Income is overstated by $36,000.

5 0

3 years ago