1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
4 years ago
9

Can You Help Me Solve for M -7+4m+10=15-2m

Mathematics
2 answers:
Rudik [331]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

m=2

Step-by-step explanation:

-7+4m+10=15-2m

We move all terms to the left:

-7+4m+10-(15-2m)=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

4m-(-2m+15)-7+10=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

4m-(-2m+15)+3=0

We get rid of parentheses

4m+2m-15+3=0

We add all the numbers together, and all the variables

6m-12=0

We move all terms containing m to the left, all other terms to the right

6m=12

m=12/6

m=2

kenny6666 [7]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

m=2

Explanation:

<em>see .pdf file</em>

Download pdf
You might be interested in
Why might you want to use the
Oksana_A [137]
U would do this because no matter the order, the answer will be the same

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why f(x) =√2+x - √2/x, is not continuous at x = 0.<br> Picture provided below.
IrinaK [193]

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation:

If you put 0 in for x, then you would be dividing by 0. Dividing by 0 is always undefined.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hi please can you help me this is a new topic and I’m very confused
olchik [2.2K]

Answer: the large jar is cheaper

Step-by-step explanation:

If you divide the £1.54 by 440g and £1.26 by 340g, you'll find which one is cheaper per gram :

1.54/440 = 0.0035

1.26/340 = 0.0037

So, by comparing both prices/gram, you've found that the large jar is cheaper.

8 0
3 years ago
10,792,400 in word form
Studentka2010 [4]
10,792,400 in word form would be ten million seven hundred ninety-two thousand four hundred. hope this helps! ♥
7 0
3 years ago
True or false? it's not possible to build a triangle with side lengths of 3 3 and 9
Anit [1.1K]
True

The two shorter lengths do not add up to more than the longest length. 3+3 is less than 9. Therefore, even if the two shorter lengths lay on top of the longer side, the two ends cannot meet to form a closed 3 sided figure
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the right triangle ABC,
    5·2 answers
  • Restaurant etiquette dictates that you should have a 15 %
    6·1 answer
  • A collector has 100 movie posters and 80 band posters. She wants to sell 20 movie posters but still have her poster collection m
    6·1 answer
  • Pls help me! i’m very confused on this certain question.
    8·1 answer
  • Help with 1 and 3 if possible show work
    11·1 answer
  • Solve each proportion
    12·2 answers
  • The expression that is equal to (9×+3) -(5× -7)
    9·1 answer
  • How to solve <br>16x&gt;-100<br><br>​
    9·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the line?
    5·1 answer
  • If the right angle triangle LMN.<br>L=30°, MN = 4cm and diagonal LM.<br>Find the LM and LN.​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!