The answer to your question is B.
Explanation:
to you ggagsusgfaaywugahagagttsgsy<em>y</em><em>y</em><em>e</em>
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer: technical feasibility
Explanation:
Technical feasibility shows how s company or an organization will deliver the goods and service to the customers. Technical feasibility is vital as companies will be able to know whether the technical resources that the company possesses will meet its capacity.
It should also be noted that technical feasibility is concerned with whether the organization has the skills needed to properly apply a given technology.
