I do believe your answer is
C. Slander
Answer: Comforts
Explanation: I got it right and it said in the text what they all need.
Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
With no First Amendment, protest rallies and marches could be prohibited according to official and/or public whim; membership in certain groups could also be punishable by law.
According to the argument posed
by Dovidio and his colleagues, cooperation has an especially positive impact
when it leads people to define a new, inclusive group. An inclusive group makes
room to accommodate new members while an exclusive group seeks to limit
membership to those who can meet some strict requirements of who have a special
status.
